How cited: Melendez v. Shultz · Go Syfert

Melendez v. Shultz (1973)

green · 30 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197319992026
But See · 1st Cir. · signal: but see · 3 citations in this opinion
But see Melendez v. Shultz, D.C., 356 F.Supp. 1205 .
Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 8 citations in this opinion
The determination that property constitutes forfeitable derivative contraband "often depends on the making of delicate judgments about previous facts and circumstances." Melendez v. Shultz, 356 F.Supp. 1205, 1210-11 (D.Mass.) (three-judge court), appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, 486 F.2d 1032 (1st Cir. 1973).
Rule Authority · Iowa
See One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Commonwealth of Pa., 380 U.S. at 699 , 85 S.Ct. at 1250 ; McKeehan v. United States, 438 F.2d 739, 743-744 (6th Cir. 1971); Melendez v. Shultz, 356 F.Supp. 1205, 1210-1211 (D.Mass.1973).
Rule Authority · E.D. Tenn.
Although there are decisions indicating that 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (a)(2) 3 provides a jurisdictional basis for an action seeking the return of forfeited property, see e. g., United States v. One 1961 Red Chevrolet Impala Sedan, C.A. 5th (1972), 457 F.2d 1353 ; Menkarell v. Bureau of Narcotics, C.A. 3d (1972), 463 F.2d 88, 91 [1]; Melendez v. Shultz, D.C.Mass. (1973), 356 F. Supp. 1205, 1208 [1], the Supreme Court has foreclosed that issue, as follows : * * * * * * * * * The Tuck…
green Lee v. Thornton (1974)
Rule Authority · D. Vt.
Melendez v. Shultz, 356 F. Supp. 1205, 1208 (D.Mass.1973) (three-judge court).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Melendez v. Schultz, 356 F.Supp. 1205 (d.Mass.1973). 50 The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Cited (see also) · D. Maryland · signal: see also
See also Melendez v. Shultz, 356 F.Supp. 1205 (D.Mass.) (three-judge court), appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, 486 F.2d 1032 (1st Cir. 1973).