United States v. Minkowitz (1995)

(Rhode Island v Innis, 446 US 291, 301 [1980]; People v Ferro, 63 NY2d 316 [1984], cert denied 472 US 1007 [1985]; People v Smith, 209 AD2d 1005 [4th Dept 1994], lv denied 85 NY2d 866 [1995].) The Supreme Court has held that the asking of “routine booking questions” constitutes custodial interrogation, but that answers given in response to those questions fall outside the protection of Miranda if they are “reasonably related to the police’s administrative concerns.” (Pennsyl…

See United States v. Gomez, 810 F.2d 947, 955 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 2488 , 96 L.Ed.2d 379 (1987); United States, v. Wilson, 11 F.3d 346, 353 (2nd Cir.1993) (“Moreover, the use of false identification is relevant and admissible to show consciousness of guilt, see United States v. Morales, 577 F.2d 769, 772 (2d Cir.1978) ...”), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1130 , 114 S.Ct. 2142 , 128 L.Ed.2d 870 (1994); Minkowitz, 889 F.Supp. at 628 (“Indeed, the Second…

The subjective intent of the agent is relevant but not conclusive."). 23. 23 See also People v. Rodney , 648 N.E.2d 471, 474 (N.Y. 1995) (exception inapplicable " if the questions, though facially appropriate, are likely to elicit incriminating admissions because of the circumstances of the particular case," but citing Muniz -plurality footnote); Thomas , 731 A.2d at 423 n.12 ( noting that "[t]he articulation of the relevant test in Hughes and Rodney [ supra ] differs somewh…

See also People v. Rodney, 85 N.Y.2d 289 , 624 N.Y.S.2d 95 , 648 N.E.2d 471, 474 (1995) (exception inapplicable "if the questions, though facially appropriate, are likely to elicit incriminating admissions because of the circumstances of the particular case,” but citing Muniz-plurality footnote); Thomas, 731 A.2d at 423 n. 12 (noting that ”[t]he articulation of the relevant test in Hughes and Rodney [supra ] differs somewhat from the Muniz plurality’s ‘designed to elicit inc…

Stated otherwise, “[t]he closer the connection between the crime in question and the information sought, the stronger the inference that the [police officer] should have known that [the] inquiry was ‘reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.’ ” United States v. Minkowitz, 889 F.Supp. 624, 628 (E.D.N.Y.1995)(quoting Muniz, 496 U.S. at 601 , 110 S.Ct. at 2650 , 110 L.Ed.2d at 551 ).

See, e.g., United States v. Minkowitz, 889 F.Supp. 624, 627 (E.D.N.Y.1995) (citing Thompson v. United States, 821 F.Supp. 110, 120 (W.D.N.Y.1993) (“[T]he booking exception is not absolute.”)); Muniz, 496 U.S. at 602 n. 14, 110 S.Ct. 2638 .

See, e.g., United States v. Minkowitz, 889 F.Supp. 624, 627 (E.D.N.Y.1995) (citing Thompson v. United States, 821 F.Supp. 110, 120 (W.D.N.Y.1993) (“[T]he booking exception is not absolute.”)); Muniz, 496 U.S. at 602 n. 14, 110 S.Ct. 2638 .

See Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 601 , 110 S.Ct. 2638 , 110 *525 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 , 564 n. 15, 103 S.Ct. 916 , 74 L.Ed.2d 748 (1983); Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 301 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980); Clayton v. Gibson, 199 F.3d 1162, 1173 (10th Cir.1999) (noting that " 'routine booking questions do not constitute interrogation because they do not normally elicit incriminating responses’ ”) (citation omitted); …

See Pennsylvania v. Muniz , 496 U.S. 582, 601 (1990); South Dakota v. Neville , 459 U.S. 553 , 564 n.15 (1983); Rhode Island v. Innis , 446 U.S. 291, 301 (1980); Clayton v. Gibson , 199 F.3d 1162, 1173 (10 th Cir. 1999) (noting that "'routine booking questions do not constitute interrogation because they do not normally elicit incriminating responses'") (citation omitted); United States v. Carmona , 873 F.2d 569, 573-74 (2d Cir. 1989) (stating that neither Miranda nor Edward…