How cited: Beverages International, Ltd. v. Schenley Affiliated Brands Corp. (In Re Beverages Intern… · Go Syfert

Beverages International, Ltd. v. Schenley Affiliated Brands Corp. (In Re Beverages International, Ltd.) (1986)

green · 8 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
See, e.g., Moody v. Amoco Oil Co., 734 F.2d 1200, 1213 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 982 , 105 S.Ct. 386 , 83 L.Ed.2d 321 (1984); In re Beverages Int’l Ltd., 61 B.R. 966, 972 (Bankr.D.Mass.1986); In re Heaven Sent Ltd., 37 B.R. 597, 597-98 (Bankr.E.D.Penn.1984).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See, e.g., Moody v. Amoco Oil Co., 734 F.2d 1200, 1213 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 982 , 105 S.Ct. 386 , 83 L.Ed.2d 321 (1984); In re Beverages Int’l Ltd., 61 B.R. 966, 972 (Bankr.D.Mass.1986); In re Heaven Sent Ltd., 37 B.R. 597, 597-98 (Bankr.E.D.Penn.1984).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Codex argues that Massachusetts law excused it from accepting performance from an assignee for three reasons: 1) the Agreement was a personal service contract; 2) even if it was not a personal service contract, it was a contract based on “a relation of personal confidence,” see Paper Products Machine Co. v. Safepack Mills, 239 Mass. 114, 122 , 131 N.E. 288 , 290 (1921); In re Beverages Int'l, Ltd., 61 B.R. 966, 974 (Bankr.D.Mass.1986); and 3) assignment of the contract would…
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
“Case law and the legislative history make it plain that section 541 was ‘intended to be broad and was designed to include all kinds of property, tangible or intangible....’ ” Beverages Int’l, Ltd. v. Schenley Affiliated Brands Corp. (In re Beverages Int’l, Ltd.), 61 B.R. 966, 971 (Bankr.D.Mass.1986) (quoting Matter of Varisco, 16 B.R. 634, 637 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1981)).