Lewis v. Lewis (1969)
green
· 16 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Malin v. Mininberg (2003)
See Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. §§ 71 ; 215(a); see also Lewis v. Lewis, 256 Md. 45, 53 , 259 A.2d 246 (1969)(noting that alimony is “deductible in the computation of net income for federal tax purposes .... ”); Groves v. Alexander, 255 Md. 715 , 719 n. 2, 259 A.2d 285 (1969)(“Sections 71 and 215 [of the Internal Revenue Code] speak of payments by the husband to the wife and of the deductibility by the husband and includibility in the income of the wife.”).
noting that alimony is “deductible in the computation of net income for federal tax purposes .... ”
green
Boucher v. Shomber (1985)
See Lewis v. Lewis, 256 Md. 45, 55 , [ 259 A.2d 246 ] (1969); Langville v. Langville, 191 Md. 103, 110 [ 60 A.2d 206 ] (1948); Foote v. Foote, 190 Md. 171, 177 [ 57 A.2d 804 ] (1948); Dickey v. Dickey, 154 Md. 675, 680-81 [ 141 A. 387 ] (1928).
green
Winston v. Winston (1981)
See, for example, Lewis v. Lewis, 256 Md. 45 , 259 A.2d 246 (1969), Kemp v. Kemp, 287 Md. 165 , 411 A.2d 1028 (1980), and cases cited therein.
green
In Re the Marriage of Stamp (1980)
Vollenhover v. Vollenhover, 4 Ill.App.2d 44, 45-46, 123 N.E.2d 114, 114-15 (1954); Con-dy v. Condy, 328 Ill.App. 8, 12-15 , 65 N.E.2d 219, 221-22 (1946); Keller v. Keller, 230 So.2d 808, 810 (Miss.1970); In re Marriage of Mahalingam, 21 Wash.App. 228, 234 , 584 P.2d 971, 976 (1978) (“We believe in these times of economic uncertainty where rampant inflation quickly diminishes the effective amount of support, the use of a reasonable escalation provision is not violative of eit…
green
Kemp v. Kemp (1980)
See Lewis v. Lewis, 256 Md. 45, 55 , 259 A.2d 246, 250 (1969); Langville v. Langville, 191 Md. 103, 110 , 60 A.2d 206, 209 (1948); Foote v. Foote, 190 Md. 171, 177 , 57 A.2d 804, 807 (1948); Dickey v. Dickey, supra, 154 Md. at 680-81 , 141 A. at 389-90 .