DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London (2007)
green
· 126 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Vermont law provides that insurance coverage “shall not be placed with a non-admitted insurer unless the full amount of insurance required is not reasonably procurable from admitted insurers actually transacting that kind and class of insurance in [Vermont]; and the amount of insurance exported shall be only the excess over the amount procurable from admitted insurers actually transacting and insuring that kind and class of insurance.” 8 V.S.A. § 5024(a); see also DeBartolo …
green
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Energy Wise Homes, Inc., Uhler and Poulos Insurance, Inc. (2015)
Superior Judge (Ret.), Specially Assigned [1] Vermont law provides that insurance coverage “shall not be placed with a non-admitted insurer unless the full amount of insurance required is not reasonably procurable from admitted insurers actually transacting that kind and class of insurance in [Vermont]; and the amount of insurance exported shall be only the excess over the amount procurable from admitted insurers actually transacting and insuring that kind and class of insur…
green
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Energy Wise Homes, Inc., Uhler and Poulos Insurance, Inc. (2015)
Superior Judge (Ret.), Specially Assigned [1] Vermont law provides that insurance coverage “shall not be placed with a non-admitted insurer unless the full amount of insurance required is not reasonably procurable from admitted insurers actually transacting that kind and class of insurance in [Vermont]; and the amount of insurance exported shall be only the excess over the amount procurable from admitted insurers actually transacting and insuring that kind and class of insur…
green
velazquez v. pallito (2023)
See DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 2007 VT 31 , 4 8, 181 Vt. 609 (“If both parties seek summary judgment, each must be given the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences when the opposing party’s motion is being evaluated.”).
See id. at 8 (citing DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 2007 VT 31 , ¶ 16, 181 Vt. 609 , for the principle that interpretations of statutes that render any provision mere surplusage should be avoided).
green
Chandler v. State (2014)
See DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 2007 VT 31 , ¶ 8, 181 Vt. 609 (“If both parties seek summary judgment, each must be given the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences when the opposing party’s motion is being evaluated.”).
green
Velazquez v. Pallito (2014)
See DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 2007 VT 31 , ¶ 8, 181 Vt. 609 (“If both parties seek summary judgment, each must be given the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences when the opposing party’s motion is being evaluated.”).
green
RLI Insurance v. Klonsky (2011)
See DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 181 Vt. 609 , 925 A.2d 1018 , 1024 (2007) (citing Vt.
citing Vt. State Colls. Staff Fed’n v. Vt. State Colls., 157 Vt. 645 , 596 A.2d 355, 357 (1991) (entry order)
green
NORTHERN SEC. INS. CO., INC. v. Doherty (2009)
See DeBartolo, 2007 VT 31 , ¶ 9 (ambiguities are construed in favor of coverage); Fireman’s Fund, 2004 VT 93, ¶ 9 (same). ¶ 11.