How cited: Mueller v. Allen · Go Syfert

Mueller v. Allen (1981)

green · 45 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198220042026
green Mueller v. Allen (1983)
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 3 citations in this opinion
Tuition for driver education when it is part of the school curriculum.” 514 F. Supp. 998, 1000 (1981).
green Mueller v. Allen (1982)
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
The district court granted the Commissioner's and intervening taxpayers' motions for summary judgment and held that the statute is "neutral on its face and in its application and does not have a primary effect of either advancing or inhibiting religion." Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1003 (D.Minn.1981). 1 This appeal followed.
green Mueller v. Allen (1982)
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
The district court granted the Commissioner’s and intervening taxpayers’ motions for summary judgment and held that the statute is “neutral on its face and in its application and does not have a primary effect of either advancing or inhibiting religion.” Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1003 (D.Minn. 1981). 1 This appeal followed.
Rule Authority · N.D. Ga. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cf., Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1000 (D.Minn.1981) (Court is not irretrievably bound by its own precedents, but in the interest of uniformity, stability, and certainty may follow earlier cases).
green In Re Johnson (2003)
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Minn.
There is, in fact, opinion to the contrary from one of this district’s district judges: Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1001 (D.Minn.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 1195 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd, 463 U.S. 388 , 103 S.Ct. 3062 , 77 L.Ed.2d 721 (1983).
Rule Authority · S.D. Miss.
See TMF Tool Co., Inc. v. Muller, 913 F.2d 1185, 1191 (7th Cir.1990); see also Starhuck v. San Francisco, 556 F.2d 450 , 457 n. 13 (9th Cir. 1977); Forward v. Cotton Petroleum Corp., 540 F.Supp. 122 (D.Colo.1982); Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1001 (D.Minn.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 1195 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd, 463 U.S. 388 , 103 S.Ct. 3062 , 77 L.Ed.2d 721 (1983).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Although I believe that it is usually wise to preserve intradistrict comity, this is not the case when a district judge is “clearly convinced ... that more good than harm would result from a departure from precedent.” Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1001 (D.Minn.1981).
Rule Authority · Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Id., at 198; Starbuck v. San Francisco, 556 F.2d 450 , 457 n. 13 (9th Cir.1977) (the doctrine of stare decisis does not compel one district judge to follow a decision of another in the same district); Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1001 (D.Minn.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 1195 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd, 463 U.S. 388 , 103 S.Ct. 3062 , 77 L.Ed.2d 721 (1983) (district court not bound by rulings of three-judge district court in same district upholding constitutionality of statute); …
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Threadgill v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 928 F.2d 1366 , 1371 & n. 7 (3d Cir.1991) (citing multiple authorities for this premise); United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of 203 Paper Bags, 818 F.2d 569, 572 (7th Cir.1987); Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1001 (D.Minn.1981), aff'd 676 F.2d 1195 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd 463 U.S. 388 , 103 S.Ct. 3062 , 77 L.Ed.2d 721 (1983); Starbuck v. City and County of San Francisco, 556 F.2d 450 , 457 n. 13 (9th Cir.1977).
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Mich.
But because no judge within a multi-judge district is bound by the decision of other district judges, Starbuck v. City and County of San Francisco, 556 F.2d 450 , 457 n. 13 (9th Cir.1977); Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1001 (D.Minn.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 1195 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd, 463 U.S. 388 , 103 S.Ct. 3062 , 77 L.Ed.2d 721 (1983); White v. Baltic Conveyor Co., 209 F.Supp. 716 (D.N.J.1962), there will be a strong incentive to appeal an adverse decision of the bankru…
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
See Starbuck v. City and County of San Francisco, 556 F.2d 450 , 457 n. 13 (9th Cir.1977); Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1000 (D.Minn.1981) (a court’s decision is not binding upon courts of equal rank).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ga.
Although this Court is not bound by either of these decisions, see Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1000-01 (D.Minn.1981); Starbuck v. City & County of San Francisco, 556 F.2d 450 , 457 n.13 (9th Cir. 1977), reference will be made to these decisions when appropriate in an effort to avoid rehashing issues which need no further elaboration. .
Cited · D.N.D. · signal: see
See Mueller v. Allen, 514 F. Supp. 998, 1000-01 (D.
noting that a court “is not irretrievably bound by its own precedents”
Cited · S.D. Ga. · signal: see
See Mueller v. Allen, 514 F.Supp. 998, 1000-01 (D.Minn.1981); Starbuck v. City & County of San Francisco, 556 F.2d 450 , 457 n. 13 (9th Cir.1977). 3 After careful consideration, 1 find that I must respectfully part company with Judge Evans’ analysis in this matter since I view the Jones decision to be entirely relevant to cases dealing with preAct policies.