How cited: Kizer v. Curators of University of Missouri · Go Syfert

Kizer v. Curators of University of Missouri (1993)

green · 11 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
No. 59, 878 F.Supp. 153, 156 (E.D.Mo.1995), or they apply broad statutory definitions of "employer," Darby v. Bratch, 287 F.3d 673, 680-81 (8th Cir. 2002); Kizer v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo., 816 F.Supp. 548, 550-51 (E.D.Mo. 1993).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
No. 59, 878 F.Supp. 153, 156 (E.D.Mo.1995), or they apply broad statutory definitions of “employer,” Darby v. Bratch, 287 F.3d 673 , 680-81 (8th Cir.2002); Kizer v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo., 816 F.Supp. 548, 550-51 (E.D.Mo.1993).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
However, the Eighth Circuit has recognized an exception to Title VII’s charge-filing requirement when the entity named in the charge and the unnamed entity constitute a “single employer.” Greenwood v. Ross, 778 F.2d 448, 451 (8th Cir. 1985); Kizer v. Curators of University of Missouri, 816 F. Supp. 548, 551 (E.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Moreover, even if Gurguis did not personally participate in conciliation efforts, “a supervisor has an adequate opportunity to conciliate when the employer had such an opportunity and the supervisor’s conciliation interests would be commensurate with his employer’s.” Kizer v. Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 816 F. Supp. 548, 551 (E.D.
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Kizer v. Curators of University of Missouri, 816 F.Supp. 548, 551 (E.D.Mo.1993); Birkbeck v. Marvel Lighting Corp., 30 F.3d 507, 510-11 (4th Cir.1994).
Cited (see also) · W.D. Mo. · signal: see also
See also Kizer v. Curators of the University of Missouri, 816 F.Supp. 548, 552 (E.D.Mo.1993) (hold *1032 ing that the MHRA allows punitive damages against a political subdivision).
Cited (see also) · S.D. Tex. · signal: see, e.g.
Rutland v. Office of Attorney Gen., State of Miss., 851 F.Supp. 793 , 802-03 (S.D.Miss.1994), aff'd sub. nom., Rutland v. Moore, 54 F.3d 226 (5th Cir.1995); see, e.g., Kizer v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo., 816 F.Supp. 548, 550 (E.D.Mo.1993); Kauffman v. Kent State Univ., 815 F.Supp. 1077, 1081-82 (N.D.Ohio 1993), aff'd, 21 F.3d 428 (6th Cir.1994); Wanner v. State of Kan., 766 F.Supp. 1005, 1006-07 (D.Kan.1991); Young v. Sedgwick County, 660 F.Supp. 918, 924 (D.Kan.1987); Pr…
Cited (see also) · S.D. Tex. · signal: see, e.g.
Rutland v. Office of Attorney Gen., State of Miss., 851 F.Supp. 793 , 802-03 (S.D.Miss.1994), aff'd sub. nom., Rutland v. Moore, 54 F.3d 226 (5th Cir.1995); see, e.g., Kizer v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo., 816 F.Supp. 548, 550 (E.D.Mo.1993); Kauffman v. Kent State Univ., 815 F.Supp. 1077, 1081-82 (N.D.Ohio 1993), aff'd, 21 F.3d 428 (6th Cir.1994); Wanner v. State of Kan., 766 F.Supp. 1005, 1006-07 (D.Kan.1991); Young v. Sedgwick County, 660 F.Supp. 918, 924 (D.Kan.1987); Pr…
Cited · E.D. Ark. · signal: accord
Greenwood v. Ross, supra, 778 F.2d at 451 ; accord Kizer v. Curators of Univ. of Mo., 816 F.Supp. 548, 551 (E.D.Mo.1993).