Viskup v. Viskup (1988)
green
· 50 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 11 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Cardiff v. Ellinwood (2007)
OCS urges that these statutes, and the case law construing them, provide that “no one is to be exempt from the obligation to pay child support.” Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 210 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988). ¶ 7.
green
Cardiff v. Ellinwood (2007)
OCS urges that these statutes, and the case law construing them, provide that "no one is to be exempt from the obligation to pay child support." Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 210 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988). ¶ 7.
green
Maglin v. Tschannerl (2002)
See, e.g., Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., General Motors Corp., 153 Vt. 179, 187 , 571 A.2d 609, 614 (1989) (remedial statutes “are entitled to a liberal construction in favor of those who are intended to benefit from the legislation”); Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 211 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988) (remedial purpose of legislation “requires a liberal construction so as to give full force and effect to the intentions of the Legislature”).
remedial purpose of legislation “requires a liberal construction so as to give full force and effect to the intentions of the Legislature”
green
Hunt v. Hunt (1994)
This Court has noted in construing these provisions that “it is clear that the Legislature . . . intended to require at least a nominal child support award in all cases.” Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 210 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988).
green
Fotinopoulos v. Department of Corrections (2002)
“The fundamental rule, underlying all other rules of statutory construction, is that this Court must give effect to the intent of the Legislature.” Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 210 , 552 A.2d 400, 401 (1988).
green
Town of Killington v. State (2001)
State v. Therrien, 161 Vt. 26, 31 , 633 A.2d 272, 275 (1993); see 3 N. Singer, supra, § 60.01, at 147 (“Remedial statutes are liberally construed to suppress the evil and advance the remedy.”); Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 211 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988) (remedial purpose for which legislation was enacted requires liberal construction so as to give full force and effect to legislative intent).
remedial purpose for which legislation was enacted requires liberal construction so as to give full force and effect to legislative intent
green
Knowles v. Thompson (1997)
We have declared in this regard that § 650 “requires a liberal construction so as to give full force and effect to the intentions of the Legislature.” Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 211 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988).
green
Roddy v. Roddy (1998)
See Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208,210 , 552 A.2d 400,401 (1988).
green
C.D. v. N.M. (1993)
See Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 210 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988).
green
Cd v. Nm (1993)
See Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 210 , 552 A.2d 400, 402 (1988).
green
Klein v. Klein (1990)
See Viskup v. Viskup, 150 Vt. 208, 212 , 552 A.2d 400, 403 (1988).