How cited: Kelly v. O'NEIL · Go Syfert

Kelly v. O'NEIL (1973)

green · 55 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 34 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197319992026
green Genova v. Genova (1990)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct. · 6 citations in this opinion
Indeed, even had the report been his, made on the basis of facts furnished to him by witnesses, it would have been excluded for the reasons explicated in Kelly v. O'Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
green Wiik v. Rathore (1986)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Wingate v. Emery Air Freight Corp., 385 Mass. 402, 409 (1982) (concurring opinion); Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 317 (1973).
Rule Authority · Mass. · 2 citations in this opinion
See G.L.c. 231, § 119; Bouchie v. Murray, 376 Mass. 524, 530 (1978); Kelly v. O'Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 317 (1973).
green Julian v. Randazzo (1980)
Rule Authority · Mass. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cf. Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. Jewett (2004)
Rule Authority · Mass.
It is however, DNA viable should we want to do that.” See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316 (1973) (hearsay statements in police accident report made by third parties to investigating officer not admissible).
hearsay statements in police accident report made by third parties to investigating officer not admissible
green Azran v. Potter (1996)
Rule Authority · Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.
Commonwealth v. Hussey, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 1015, 1016 (1982); Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316 (1973).
Rule Authority · Mass. Super. Ct.
Amory v. Commonwealth, 321 Mass. 240, 252-53 (1947); Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass.App.Ct. 313, 317-19 (1973).
Rule Authority · Mass. Super. Ct.
Id. §8.13.1 at 506 (citing Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass.App.Ct. 313, 319 (1973)).
green Doyle v. Dong (1991)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
Finally, and perhaps most significantly, the jury took with them into their deliberations the Children’s hospital record, a written document with an “[inherent] aura of officialdom,” see Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 317 (1973), which they could study.
Quote Authority · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 317 (1973) (“A [business] record admissible under that exception may not contain second level hearsay”).
“A [business] record admissible under that exception may not contain second level hearsay”
green Adoption of George (1989)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
It is a characteristic of elements of the service plans, case reviews, and assessments that they incorporate reported material supplied by other agency personnel, thus raising the problem of second level hearsay discussed in Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. Trapp (1985)
Rule Authority · Mass.
Whether such disciplinary reports ought to be viewed as merely business records in light of the “aura of officialdom inherent in the report[s] and apparent on [their] face,” Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 317 (1973) (police reports), or treated with greater skepticism in a criminal case, we leave to another day.
police reports
green Commonwealth v. Fudge (1985)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
Trooper Smith’s list, prepared from and offered to prove the truth of statements of the Munceys, was “second level” or “totem pole” hearsay and inadmissible, Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. LeCain (1985)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
See also Commonwealth v. DeBrosky, 363 Mass. 718 , 725 n.6 (1973); Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973). 2.
green Tosti v. Ayik (1985)
Rule Authority · Mass.
See Wingate v. Emery Air Freight Corp., 385 Mass. 402, 406 (1982) (“The preparer’s hearsay sources must carry the same indicia of reliability, arising from regularity and business motives, that bring his own act of recording the information within the statutory exception”); Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316 (1973) (second level of hearsay inadmissible under G.
second level of hearsay inadmissible under G. L. c. 233, § 78
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
Compare Amory v. Commonwealth, 321 Mass. 240, 252-253 (1947); Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 319 (1973).
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 315-317 (1973).
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: cf.
Cf. Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 315-317 (1973).
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 314-317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. Alves (1978)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. Ennis (1974)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
However, we are of the opinion that the judge did not abuse his discretion in the case before us in excluding diagnostic opinions and other statements which posed problems of multiple level hearsay (see Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316 [1973]) and required expert testimony to be properly understood by a jury.
green Irwin v. Town of Ware (1984)
Cited · Mass. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Kelley v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973), and cases cited.
green Bouchie v. Murray (1978)
Cited · Mass. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Kelly v. O'Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973); Juaire v. Nardin, 395 F.2d 373, 379 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
green Commonwealth v. Dingle (2008)
Cited · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Kelley v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316 (1973) (second level of hearsay appearing in a police officer’s report is not admissible).
second level of hearsay appearing in a police officer’s report is not admissible
Cited · Mass. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316 (1973) (statements to police officer contained in police report not inadmissible hearsay if not offered for “truth of the matters”); P.J.
Cited · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 318-319 (1973); Building Inspector of Chatham v. Kendrick, 17 Mass. App. Ct. 928, 929-930 (1983).
Cited (see also) · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: see also
See also Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. Walker (1982)
Cited · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. Wilson (1981)
Cited · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973).
green Commonwealth v. Meech (1980)
Cited · Mass. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973); Johnson v. Lutz, 253 N.Y. 124, 127-129 (1930). 11 Under the heading “Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable,” Fed.
green Commonwealth v. Walker (1979)
Cited · Mass. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 316-317 (1973); Cf. Bouchie v. Murray, 376 Mass. 524, 528-530 (1978); Commonwealth v. Alves, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 572, 582-583 (1978); Commonwealth v. Happnie, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 193, 199 (1975).
Cited (see also) · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: compare
Compare Kelly v. O’Neil, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 313, 315-316 (1973).
Cited · Mass. · signal: see
See Kelly v. O’Neil, Mass. App. Ct. ( 296 N.E. 2d 223 ); United States v. Burruss, 418 F. 2d 677, 678-679 (4th Cir.) ; McCormick, Evidence (2d ed.) § 310.