Prahl v. Brosamle (1987)
green
· 103 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 29 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance (2004)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Miller v. Kim (1995)
Well, there are at least alternative arguments that have been presented for ... assessing the child." We have described our scope of review as follows: Generally, ”[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Schaefer v. American Family Mutual Insurance (1994)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Marriage of Steinbach v. Gustafson (1993)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
State v. Boshcka (1992)
Generally, "[we] will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
In RE MARRIAGE OF WEBERG v. Weberg (1990)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987). [6] When fixing maintenance, the starting point is sec. 767.26, Stats., which sets forth several specific factors to be considered by the court and concludes with a "catchall" provision allowing the court to consider any other factors it may deem relevant.
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W. 2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Johnson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (1990)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
State v. Spears (1988)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
Wis. 2d 658, 667, 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
In RE MARRIAGE OF DOERR v. Doerr (1994)
The court noted that Charles "may also inherit monies or property on the death of various relatives and may receive substantial gifts in the future," although it found it "impossible to determine ... when or whether [he] will gain control of these assets, or how much they may be worth now or in the future." 3 The court found, for example, that "their home lacked many of thé amenities which most people of more modest means would take for granted." 4 The trial court's suppleme…
green
MATTER OF FINDING OF CONTEMPT IN STATE v. Kruse (1994)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Oliveto v. Circuit Court for Crawford County (1994)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Peplinski v. Fobe's Roofing, Inc. (1994)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Matter of Settlement for Personal Injuries Konicki (1994)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Kovalic v. DEC INTERNATIONAL (1994)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
State v. Hines (1993)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987). *859 The state asserts that Hines has waived this issue by failing to object to the introduction of the evidence during the trial.
green
State v. Boschka (1992)
Generally, 11 [w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Sommers v. Friedman (1992)
Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
State v. Larsen (1991)
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed. 1 We will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision.” Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Brown v. Mosser Lee Co. (1991)
Stated another way, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court's decision." Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
State v. Harp (1989)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
James v. Moe (1989)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
State v. Thompson (1988)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Western Supply Co. v. T. V. Appliance Mart, Inc. (1988)
Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Juul v. Zeman (2019)
See Prahl v. Brosamle , 142 Wis. 2d 658 , 667, 420 N.W.2d 372 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
Laughland v. Beckett (2015)
See Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372 (Ct. App. 1987) (We will not reverse a circuit court's damages determination if the record shows that the court exercised discretion and provides a reasonable basis for the court's decision.).
We will not reverse a circuit court's damages determination if the record shows that the court exercised discretion and provides a reasonable basis for the court's decision.
green
In RE MARRIAGE OF METZ v. Keener (1997)
See Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).
green
State v. Bjerkaas (1991)
See Prahl v. Brosamle, 142 Wis. 2d 658, 667 , 420 N.W.2d 372, 376 (Ct. App. 1987).