Estrada-Canales v. Gonzales (2006)

green · 14 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Rumierz v. Gonzales (2006)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 , 445 n. 29, 447-48, 107 S.Ct. 1207 , 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987); Estrada-Canales v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 208, 214-15 (1st Cir.2006).

green Hernandez-Martinez v. Whitaker (2019)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

See Kechichian v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 15, 21-22 (1st Cir. 2008); Estrada-Canales v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 208, 220 (1st Cir. 2006).

green Bayari v. Holder (2014)

Rule Authority · 7th Cir.

Lastly, to the extent that Bayari wishes to challenge the alternative basis for the removal order — entering the United States without proper travel documents, see 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(7)(A)(i)(I); Estrada-Canales v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 208, 219, n. 12 (1st Cir.2006); Perez-Rodriguez v. I.N.S., 3 F.3d 1074,1079 (7th Cir.1993) — he has forfeited any challenge by not developing an argument before the Board or us, see Aguilar-Mejia, 616 F.3d at 704 .

green Hani Bayari v. Eric Holder, Jr. (2014)

Rule Authority · 7th Cir.

No. 13‐3085 Page 5 Lastly, to the extent that Bayari wishes to challenge the alternative basis for the removal order—entering the United States without proper travel documents, see 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(7)(A)(i)(I); Estrada‐Canales v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 208, 219, n.12 (1st Cir. 2006); Perez‐ Rodriguez v. I.N.S., 3 F.3d 1074, 1079 (7th Cir. 1993)—he has forfeited any challenge by not developing an argument before the Board or us, see Aguilar‐Mejia, 616 F.3d at 704 .

green Ramirez v. Gonzales (2006)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

Because the Board affirmed summarily, we review the decision of the Immigration Judge directly, Katebi v. Ashcroft, 396 F.3d 463, 465-66 (1st Cir.2005), and in matters such as this, “administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Estradar-Canales v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 208, 215 (1st Cir.2006) (substantial evidence standard).

green Kechichian v. Mukasey (2008)