De Aruajo v. Gonzales (2006)
green
· 29 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 27 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Ramirez Matias v. Sessions (2017)
App. P. 10(c), 11(a); De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 155 (1st Cir. 2006) (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(1)); United States v. One Motor Yacht Named Mercury, 527 F.2d 1112, 1113 (1st Cir. 1975) ("The burden is on the appellant to provide this court with an appendix sufficient to support its points on appeal.”).
citing 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(1)
green
Díaz-Colón v. Fuentes-Agostini (2015)
It is black letter law that “we deem waived claims not made or claims adverted to in a cursory fashion, unaccompanied by developed argument.” Rodríguez v. Municipality of San Juan, 659 F.3d 168, 175 (1st Cir.2011); cf. De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 152-53 (1st Cir.2006) (petitioner’s failure to challenge Board of Immigration Appeal’s summary dismissal of his case for failure to file a brief waived his argument on the merits).
green
Suryo Nagautama v. Atty Gen USA (2010)
De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir. 2006); Voci v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 607 , 610 n.1 (3d Cir. 2005). 4 “pattern or practice,” the persecution of a group must be “systemic, pervasive, or organized.” Lie v. Ashcroft, 396 F.3d 530, 537 (3d Cir. 2005).
green
Nagautama v. Attorney General of the United States (2010)
De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006); Voci v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 607 , 610 n. 1 (3d Cir.2005). .
green
Duarte v. Attorney General of the United States (2010)
De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006); Voci v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 607 , 609 n. 1 (3d Cir.2005).
green
Elmer Duarte v. Atty Gen USA (2010)
De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir. 2006); Voci v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 607 , 609 n.1 (3d Cir. 2005).
green
Wiendarta v. Attorney General of the United States (2009)
De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006); Voci v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 607 , 610 n. 1 (3d Cir.2005). 3 .
green
Sutiowijono v. Attorney General of the United States (2009)
De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006); Voci v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 607 , 610 n. 1 (3d Cir.2005).
green
Mejia-Rodriguez v. Holder (2009)
See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D); De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006); see also Conteh v. Gonzales, 461 F.3d 45, 63-64 (1st Cir.2006)(discussing restrictions on judicial review in cases involving waiver of inadmissibility under § 1182(h)).
green
Reda v. Mukasey (2008)
This point is critical, because, in the immigration context, arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel must point to a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, see Denko v. INS, 351 F.3d 717, 723 (6th Cir.2003), and because “an alien does not have a constitutionally protected interest in receiving discretionary relief from removal or deportation,” Ramirez v. Gonzales, 247 Fed.Appx. 782, 786 (6th Cir.2007) (quoting De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146…
green
Jose Garcia-Aguillon v. Michael B. Mukasey (2008)
Garcia-Mateo v. Keisler, 503 F.3d 698, 700 (8th Cir. 2007) (citing Nativi-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 344 F.3d 805, 808 (8th Cir. 2003) (no constitutionally protected interest in discretionary relief from removal)); De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153-55 (1st Cir. 2006) (no colorable due process claim when alien fails to state a protected liberty or property interest).
no colorable due process claim when alien fails to state a protected liberty or property interest
green
Garcia-Aguillon v. Mukasey (2008)
Garcia-Mateo v. Keisler, 503 F.3d 698, 700 (8th Cir.2007) (citing Nativi-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 344 F.3d 805 , 808 (8th Cir.2003) (no constitutionally protected interest in discretionary relief from removal)); De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153-55 (1st Cir.2006) (no colorable due process claim when alien fails to state a protected liberty or property interest).
green
Saliba v. Mukasey (2008)
See Hana, 503 F.3d at 43-44 ; De Araujo v. Gonzáles, 457 F.3d 146, 153-55 (1st Cir.2006); Mehilli, 433 F.3d at 93-94. *334 Second, Saliba’s premise is factually incorrect.
green
Ramirez v. Gonzales (2007)
Because “an alien does not have a constitutionally protected interest in receiving discretionary relief from removal or deportation,” De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 154 (1st Cir.2006), he can hardly claim a constitutionally protected interest in what the IJ or BIA considers, or does not consider, in determining whether to grant discretionary relief.
green
Guillemard-Ginorio v. Contreras-Gomez (2007)
But “issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.” De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.1990)).
green
Pan v. Gonzales (2007)
We refuse to go down so wayward a path. 5 Accord Arias v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 482 F.3d 1281, 1284 (11th Cir.2007); De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 154 (1st Cir.2006); Mehilli, 433 F.3d at 94 .
green
Hafeez v. Gonzales (2007)
See, e.g., Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748-49 (9th Cir.2006); De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 154 (1st Cir.2006); Bugayong v. INS, 442 F.3d 67, 72 (2d Cir.2006).
green
Mattes v. Dudek (2025)
The ALJ made similar findings in 14 De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir. 2006)) (holding that “issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived”).
green
James v. GMAC Mortgage LLC (2011)
De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006).
green
Vining v. Astrue (2010)
Co., 840 F.2d 985, 990 (1st Cir.1988) (“[Rule 72] does not permit a litigant to present new initiatives to the district judge.”); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006) (“[I]ssues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.” (citation omitted)). 2 With respect to whether the record as a whole supports the conclusion that the Assembler-optical job exists in se…
green
Makieh v. Holder (2009)
See De Araujo, 457 F.3d at 154-55 .
green
Williams v. Garland (2024)
Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 295 (2001) (citing In re Silva, 16 I. & N. Dec. 26, 30 (B.I.A. 1976)). - 6 - For discretionary decisions about removal, we typically have jurisdiction over only a limited set of issues: questions of law and constitutional claims. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)-(D); see De Araujo v. Gonzáles, 457 F.3d 146 , 153–54 (1st Cir. 2006).
green
Lopez v. Holder (2014)
Urizar-Carrascoza v. Holder, 727 F.3d 27, 32 (1st Cir.2013); accord De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 155 (1st Cir.2006); Elysee v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 221, 223-24 (1st Cir.2006).
green
Hakim v. Holder (2010)
First, “the alien [must have] exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1); see De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 152 (1st Cir.2006) (“This exhaustion requirement generally means that the BIA must first review an IJ’s determination of [removability] before a petitioner may present his appeal to us.”) (citation omitted).
green
Jaisinghani v. Gonzales (2007)
See De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 154 (1st Cir.2006).
green
Fryar v. Curtis (2007)
See De Araujo v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 146, 153 (1st Cir.2006) (“[Cjonclusory statements, without further development, do not rise to the level of a cognizable appellate argument.”).
green
Okpoko v. Heinauer (2011)
See De Araujo v. Gonzáles, 457 F.3d 146, 154 (1st Cir.2006) (“A constitutional claim would at least have to be colorable before a court will exercise jurisdiction to review such a claim or question.