How cited: In Re Marriage of Rudd · Go Syfert

In Re Marriage of Rudd (1997)

green · 46 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 11
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Arika M. v. Christopher M. (2019)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 367, 373 , 688 N.E.2d 342, 346 (1997).
green Arika M. v. Christopher M. (2019)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 367, 373 , 688 N.E.2d 342, 346 (1997).
green In Re Marriage of Sobol (2003)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 367, 371-72 , 688 N.E.2d 342, 345 (1997).
green In re Marriage of Cherry (2023)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“The admissibility of evidence lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a reviewing court will not reverse the trial court's decision absent a clear abuse of discretion.” In re Marriage of Rudd, 293 Ill.
green Trinidad C. v. Augustin L. (2018)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d at 609 ; In re Marriage of Rudd, 293 Ill.
green In re Charles W. (2014)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
When interpreting the language of a statute, we “must look to the specific wording of the statute and evaluate the wording in its entirety, considering each section in connection with other sections.” In re Marriage of Rudd, 293 Ill.
green In re Charles W. (2014)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
When interpreting the language of a statute, we "must look to the specific wording of the statute and evaluate the wording in its entirety, considering each section in connection with other sections." In re Marriage of Rudd, 293 Ill.
green In re Marriage of Agers (2013)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 367, 371-72 , 688 N.E.2d 342, 345 (1997).
green In re Marriage of Sobol (2003)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 367, 371-72 , 688 N.E.2d 342, 345 (1997).
green In re Marriage of Flannery (2002)
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See In re Marriage of Rudd , 293 Ill.
noting that in order for a child's hearsay statements to be admissible under section 8--2601 of the Code, the court must conduct a reliability hearing and the statements must be corroborated
green In Re Marriage of Flannery (2002)
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See In re Marriage of Rudd, 293 Ill.
noting that in order for a child’s hearsay statements to be admissible under section 8—2601 of the Code, the court must conduct a reliability hearing and the statements must be corroborated