State v. Johnson (1995)
green
· 81 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 32 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State Of Iowa Vs. Sandra Joy Stella Leckington (2006)
In State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 642 (Iowa 1995), we held that the term custody in section 726.3 is not limited to legal custody.
green
State v. Leckington (2006)
In State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 642 (Iowa 1995), we held that the term custody in section 726.3 is'not limited to *216 legal custody.
green
State v. Webb (2002)
In State v. Johnson, by way of dictum we defined the term "control" in section 726.6(1) as referring "to the state of having restricting or governing power over someone." 528 N.W.2d 638, 641 (Iowa 1995) (citing Black's Law Dictionary 298 (5th ed.1979)).
citing Black's Law Dictionary 298 (5th ed.1979)
green
State v. Anspach (2001)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640-41 (Iowa 1995). [A]n individual could have “control” over a child without also having ordinary custody of a child.
green
State v. Randle (1999)
“We review a trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss a charge asserted in a trial information for errors of law.” State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State of Iowa v. Kevin Charles Lind (2026)
“We will reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the charge at issue if the facts the State has alleged charge a crime 7 as a matter of law.” Gonzalez, 718 N.W.2d at 307 (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995)).
green
State of Iowa v. Derek Michael White (2023)
It also means “to hold the responsibility to care for that individual.” See State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 642 (Iowa 1995) (“It is the manifest intent of the legislature to hold section 726.3 applicable to all situations in which one individual may be charged with the care and control of another.”).
“It is the manifest intent of the legislature to hold section 726.3 applicable to all situations in which one individual may be charged with the care and control of another.”
green
State of Iowa v. Eugene Harris (2019)
Because our supreme court has held that the term “custody” as used in section 726.3 is not limited to legal custody, State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 642 (Iowa 1995), the fact that Harris is not C.D.’s father or legal custodian does not decide the issue.
green
State of Iowa v. Derek McKay (2016)
This claim misunderstands what is necessary for a finding that he had “custody or control of the child.” Case law has established that “legal custody” is a narrower term than “custody,” which in turn is narrower than “control.” State v. Friend, 630 N.W.2d 843, 845 (Iowa Ct. App. 2001) (citing State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995)). “[A]n individual could have ‘control’ over a child without also having ordinary custody of a child. ‘Control’ only refers to the stat…
“We seek a reasonable 8 interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute . . . .” Id. (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995)).
green
State of Iowa v. Randall Lee Lamoreux (2016)
“We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute....” Id. (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995)).
green
State of Iowa v. Amy Jo Parmer (2015)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640-41 (Iowa 1995). .... . . .
green
State of Iowa v. Isaiah Joshua Alexander (2014)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
Hawkeye Land Company v. Iowa Utilities Board (2014)
Rather, we are to “ ‘seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute.’ ” State v. Walker, 804 N.W.2d 284, 290 (Iowa 2011) (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995)). 25 The legislative history of section 476.27 reinforces our conclusion that the legislature intended that statute to cover Hawkeye Land.
“We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute....’” State v. Walker, 804 N.W.2d 284, 290 (Iowa 2011) (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995)).
green
State of Iowa v. Carson Michael Walker (2011)
“We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute .... ” State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State v. Gonzalez (2006)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State Of Iowa Vs. Gaspar Fidel Gonzalez, Jr. (2006)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State v. Leckington (2006)
Id. at 642.
green
State v. Wells (2001)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State v. Iowa District Court for Johnson County (2000)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State v. Terry (1997)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State v. White (1997)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State v. Kidd (1997)
State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State of Iowa v. Craig E. Harrison (2014)
See Walker, 804 N.W.2d at 290 (“ ‘We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute . . . .’ ” (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 2011))).
green
State of Iowa v. Douglas Kent Lindaman (2020)
See State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995).
green
State v. Retterath (2017)
See State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (1995).
See Walker, 804 N.W.2d at 290 (“ ‘We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute . . . .’ ” (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995))).
green
State of Iowa v. Jonas Dorian Neiderbach (2013)
See State v. Walker, 804 N.W.2d 284, 290 (Iowa 2011) (“ ‘We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute ....’” (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995))); id. at 293-94 (noting our court’s “ ‘mandate to construe statutes in a fashion to avoid a constitutional infirmity where possible’ ” (quoting In re Young, 780 N.W.2d 726, 729 (Iowa 2010))). 2.
green
State of Iowa v. Christopher Craig Thompson (2013)
See State v. Walker, 804 N.W.2d 284, 290 (Iowa 2011) (“ ‘We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute . . . .’ ” (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995))); id. at 293–94 (noting our court’s “ ‘mandate to construe statutes in a fashion to avoid a constitutional infirmity where possible’ ” (quoting In re Young, 780 N.W.2d 726, 729 (Iowa 2010)). 2.
green
Kris Kolzow v. State of Iowa (2012)
See State v. Walker, 804 N.W.2d 284, 290 (Iowa 2011) (“ ‘We seek a reasonable interpretation which will best effectuate the purpose of the statute ....’” (quoting State v. Johnson, 528 N.W.2d 638, 640 (Iowa 1995))).
green
State v. Friend (2001)
See Johnson, 528 N.W.2d at 641 (stating we may look to prior form of statute to discern legislative intent).
stating we may look to prior form of statute to discern legislative intent