Commonwealth v. Smith (1989)

Commonwealth v. Smith, 386 Pa.Super. 626, 630 , 563 A.2d 905, 909 (1989).

Pursuant· to 42 Pa. C.S. $ 6103, an E official record·.·.. "may be·..evidenced by...a ·5 copy attested by the officer having the legal custody of the record, or by that officer's deputy, and accompanied by a certificate that the officer has custody." [d; see42 Pa. .. . --- C.S. $ 5328(a) (noting that any public domestic record may be admitted provided it is authenticated and sealed by the public officer having custody of the record); Rawson v. PennDOT, 99 A.3d 143, 148 (Pa. …

Commonwealth v. Sheller, 961 A.2d 187, 189 (Pa. Super. 2008) (“To properly preserve the discretionary aspects of sentencing for appellate review, the issue must be raised during sentencing or in a timely post-sentence motion.” (emphasis added)); see also Commonwealth v. Smith, 563 A.2d 905, 906 (Pa.Super. 1989) (“When [a post-sentence] motion is not timely filed, the issues presented in the untimely motion are deemed waived.”).

Indeed, “[t]his Court has held on numerous occasions that a claim of inadequate consideration of mitigating factors does not raise a substantial question for our review.” Commonwealth v. Matroni, 923 A.2d 444, 455 (Pa. Super. 2007). -4- J-S44032-15 sentence motion.” (emphasis added)); see also Commonwealth v. Smith, 563 A.2d 905, 906 (Pa. Super. 1989) (“When [a post-sentence] motion is not timely filed, the issues presented in the untimely motion are deemed waived.”).

See Commonwealth v. Smith, 386 Pa.Super. 626 , 563 A.2d 905 (1989), affirmed, 528 Pa. 380 , 598 A.2d 268 (1991) (holding that the mandatory minimum sentencing provision applies if the defendant knew that his accomplice possessed a firearm and used it during the commission of the crime). ¶ 10 In the case sub judice, Reeves pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy to commit robbery, which is a crime subject to the mandatory minimum sentencing provision of Section 9712(a).

See Commonwealth v. Smith, 563 A.2d 905 (Pa.Super. 1989).