City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais (1990)
green
· 44 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 15 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Ricker (2003)
City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais , 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D. 1990) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
State v. Deutscher (2009)
Id. (citing City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D.1990)).
green
State v. Frankfurth (2005)
City of Grand Forks v. Mata, 517 N.W.2d 626, 628 (N.D.1994); City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D.1990).
green
City of Grand Forks v. Mata (1994)
City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D.1990).
green
Fonder v. Fonder (2012)
It does not, however, require exact specification because, when “considering the sufficiency of a criminal information, technicalities have been abolished, and it is only necessary to plead an offense in its usually designated name in plain, ordinary language.” Mata , 517 N.W.2d at 628 (citing City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais , 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D. 1990)).
green
Interest of G.L.D. (2011)
Id. (citing City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais , 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D. 1990)).
green
State v. Erickson (2011)
Id. (citing City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D.1990)).
green
Eagleman v. State (2005)
City of Grand Forks v. Mata , 517 N.W.2d 626, 628 (N.D. 1994); City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais , 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D. 1990).
green
State v. Jackson (2005)
City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D.1990). [¶ 6] The information charged Jackson with failing to register under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-15, “on or about January 19, 2004 through May 27, 2004.” The trial court did not make a finding that Jackson registered during that period.
green
In Re ZCB (2003)
City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 333 (N.D.1990) (citations omitted).
green
City of Fargo v. Ellison (2001)
N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5); City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 332 (N.D.1990).
green
Stockert v. Stockert (2001)
N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5); City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais , 458 N.W.2d 330, 332 (N.D. 1990). [¶5] In light of a trial court’s important opportunity to observe and assess the credibility of witnesses, however, this Court accords great deference to a trial court’s decision to suppress evidence.
green
City of West Fargo v. Ross (2001)
N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5); City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d 330, 332 (N.D.1990). [¶ 5] In light of a trial court’s important opportunity to observe and assess the credibility of witnesses, however, this Court accords great deference to a trial court’s decision to suppress evidence.
green
State v. Gwyther (1999)
Desjarlais, 458 N.W.2d at 333 (citations omitted); see also Mata, 517 N.W.2d at 628 . [¶ 15] However, while noting “technicalities” have been abolished, both Mata and Desjarlais explicitly recognize that the complaint or information must contain a “written statement of the essential elements of the offense.” Mata, 517 N.W.2d at 628 ; Desjar-lais, 458 N.W.2d at 333 ; see also City of Fargo v. Schwagel, 544 N.W.2d 873, 875 (N.D.1996) (a complaint must state the essential eleme…
citations omitted
green
City of Fargo v. Schwagel (1996)
See id. at 333 (stating “there is no material distinction between the charge of driving under suspension and driving with a revoked license ... [u]nder either charge, the defendant is being charged with driving during a time when his or her driving privileges have been judicially or administratively removed”).