How cited: In Re AR · Go Syfert

In Re AR (1998)

green · 103 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 20 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 20
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199820122026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green People v. Smith (2001)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
In re A.R., 295 Ill.
green People v. Smith (2001)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
In re A.R. , 295 Ill.
green In re L.J. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998).
green In re R.D. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998).
green In re J.J. (2023)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” In re A.R., 295 Ill.
green In re J.W. and K.W. (2022)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998).
green In re S.H. (2022)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998).
green In re Aai. J (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998).
green In re R.M. (2019)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” In re A.R., 295 Ill.
green In re E.E. (2019)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998)). ¶ 27 Even assuming counsel provided deficient performance by failing to rebut the presumption of depravity, we conclude respondent cannot show prejudice.
green In Re Marquita M. (2012)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App.3d 527, 531 , 230 Ill.Dec. 391 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998). ¶ 15 In the case sub judice, to determine if trial counsel was ineffective in not filing a motion to suppress respondent's inculpatory statements, we must decide if she was subject to custodial interrogation and, if so, whether her statements were voluntarily made. ¶ 16 In Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , the United States Supreme Court held "the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory…
green In re: Marquita M. (2012)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998). ¶ 15 In the case sub judice, to determine if trial counsel was ineffective in not filing a motion to suppress respondent’s inculpatory statements, we must decide if she was subject to custodial interrogation and, if so, whether her statements were voluntarily made. ¶ 16 In Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444 , the United States Supreme Court held “the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from cus…
green People v. Sykes (2003)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
In re A.R., 295 Ill.
green People v. Sykes (2003)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
In re A.R. , 295 Ill.
green In Re MF (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
"A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome." In re A.R., 295 Ill.App.3d 527, 531 , 230 Ill.Dec. 391 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998).
green People v. Ferrell (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 527, 531 , 693 N.E.2d 869, 873 (1998).
green People v. D.B. (1999)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
In re A.R., 295 Ill.
green In Re DB (1999)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
A.R., *812 295 Ill.App.3d at 532, 230 Ill.Dec. 391 , 693 N.E.2d 869 , citing People v. Thomas, 137 Ill.2d 500, 516 , 148 Ill.Dec. 751 , 561 N.E.2d 57 (1990).
green People v. Jones (1998)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“A defendant is accountable for acts performed by another if he shared a common criminal plan or purpose.” In re A.R., 295 Ill.
green People v. Westmorland (2007)
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See In re A.R., 295 Ill.