In Interest of ECG (1984)

green · 19 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 9

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green in Re R Smith Minor (2018)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

See In re Detmer , 321 Mich. App. at 56 , 910 N.W.2d 318 ; see also In re Welfare of Child of J.K.T. , 814 N.W.2d 76 , 85 (Minn. Ct. App., 2012) (applying the collateral-legal-consequences rule when the minor child died during the pendency of the appeal); In Interest of E.C.G. , 345 N.W.2d at 141 (resolving an appeal filed after the minor child's death).

resolving an appeal filed after the minor child's death

green in Re R Smith Minor (2018)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

See In re Detmer/Beaudry, 321 Mich App at 56 ; see also In re Welfare of Child of JKT, 814 NW2d 76, 84-85 (Minn Ct App, 2012) (applying the collateral-legal-consequences rule when the minor child died during the pendency of the appeal); In Interest of ECG, 345 NW2d at 141 (same).

same

green in Re R Smith Minor (2018)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

same

green in Re R Smith Minor (2018)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

same

green People in the Interest of C.G., and Concerning J.N (2015)

Rule Authority · Colo. Ct. App.

In Interest of E.C.G. , 345 N.W.2d 138, 141 (Iowa 1984).

green Junkins v. Branstad (1988)

Rule Authority · Iowa

E.g., In re E.C.G., 345 N.W.2d 138, 141 (Iowa 1984); Hamilton v. City of Urbandale, 291 N.W.2d 15, 17 (Iowa 1980).

green State of Iowa v. Hubert Todd Jr. (2017)

Cited · Iowa Ct. App. · signal: see

See In re E.C.G, 345 N.W.2d 138, 141 (Iowa 1984) (wherein the right to select a personal representative in an estate of a deceased child and the right to consider where the child was to be buried were considered in determining that a termination of 5 parental rights proceeding was not moot because of the death of the child).

wherein the right to select a personal representative in an estate of a deceased child and the right to consider where the child was to be buried were considered in determining that a termination of 5 parental rights proceeding was not moot because of the death of the child

green Abigail Fredericksen v. Jennifer Olsen, Esq., in Her Individual Capacity Jennifer Olsen, Esq., in Her Capacit… (2016)

Cited (see also) · Iowa Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., In re E.C.G., 345 N.W.2d 138, 141 (Iowa 1984) (stating the “standard for granting a motion to vacate termination of parental rights under section 600A.9(2) is ‘the best interests of the child’”); In re Adoption of M.M.B., 376 N.W.2d 900, 902 (Iowa 1985) (stating section 600A.9(2) allows a parent whose rights have been terminated to seek to have the court vacate the order and the court may grant the order only if it is in the child’s best interests).

stating the “standard for granting a motion to vacate termination of parental rights under section 600A.9(2) is ‘the best interests of the child’”

green CA v. Department of Children and Families (2009)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., D.L.S. and J.S. v. L.R.G., 345 N.W.2d 138 (Iowa 1984) (reversing denial of motion to vacate TPR order after death of child, because no interest of child is served by having a TPR order remain in force after death of child *890 and vacation of TPR furthers substantial rights of natural father regarding burial rights, selection of personal representative, and distribution of property in intestate estates).