Geo. Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc. (1979)

green · 16 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 10

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United Scottish Insurance Company v. United States of America, Kathleen M. Fleming v. United States of Americ… (1980)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 135, 137-38 (D.Md.1979); Mercer v. United States, 460 F.Supp. 329, 331 (S.D.Ohio 1978); Mosley v. United States, 456 F.Supp. 671, 674-76 (E.D.Tenn.1978) 4 The court is here referring to the lack of a statutory duty to provide the protective measures required by the order.

green United Scottish Insurance v. United States (1979)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

green Remsburg v. Montgomery (2003)

Quote Authority · Md. · 2 citations in this opinion

Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 135, 138 (D.Md. 1979)(“To use a statutory duty as a foundation for a negligence claim, the plaintiff must show that it was within the class of persons the legislation was intended to protect and that the alleged injury was of the type of harm which the statute was intended to prevent”).

“To use a statutory duty as a foundation for a negligence claim, the plaintiff must show that it was within the class of persons the legislation was intended to protect and that the alleged injury was of the type of harm which the statute was intended to prevent”

green Roemen v. United States of America (2023)

Rule Authority · D.S.D.

East Europe Import Export, 463 F.Supp. 135, 137-38 (D.

observing that the scope of waiver of immunity in FTCA is generally limited to “ordinary common-law torts,” not violations of federal statutes and regulations

green Pace Ex Rel. Pace v. State (2012)

Rule Authority · Md.

Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 135, 138 (D.Md.1979)). *158 This Court has analyzed this requirement on several occasions, and each party in the instant case touts one of our precedents, explained infra, as applicable to the statutory language at issue.

green Pulliam v. Motor Vehicle Administration (2008)

Rule Authority · Md. Ct. Spec. App.

Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 135, 138 (D.Md.1979)(“To use a statutory duty as a foundation for a negligence claim, the plaintiff must show that it was within the class of persons the legislation was intended to protect and that the alleged injury was of the type of harm which the statute was intended to prevent”).

green Cortez v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2007)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Byers Sons v. East Europe Import Export, 463 F.Supp. 135, 137-138 (D.Md.1979)(observing that the scope of waiver of immunity in FTCA is generally limited to “ordinary common-law torts,” not violations of federal statutes and regulations); Central Airlines, Inc. v. United States, 169 F.3d 1174, 1175 (8th Cir.1999)(explaining that the misrepresentation of an agency’s regulations does not give rise to a state-law tort).

green Pendleton v. State (2007)

Rule Authority · Md.

Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 135, 138 (D.Md.1979) (‘To use a statutory duty as a foundation for a negligence claim, the plaintiff must show that it was within the class of persons the legislation was intended to protect and that the alleged injury was the type of harm which the statute was intended to prevent’).

green Duncan v. Honda Motor Co. (1991)

Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.

George Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export Inc., 463 F.Supp. 135, 139 (D.Md.1979).

green Gunnells v. United States (1981)

Rule Authority · S.D.W. Va

Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 135, 137 (D.Md.1979); Gelley v. Astra Pharmaceutical Prods.