In Re Hogan (1986)

green · 17 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 3

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green In re Coleman (2015)

Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.

This subdivision shall be applicable in cases of convictions of more than one offense in the same or different proceedings.” 5 Bush distinguished the case relied upon by petitioner in the present case, In re Hogan (1986) 187 Cal.App.3d 819, 824 [ 232 Cal.Rptr. 90 ], which stated, “[I]n setting the release date for an indeterminate sentence, [the Board] performs the same function as does the trial court in ordering a determinate sentence — it fixes a term of definite duration…

green Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. v. Robinson & Robinson, Inc. (2013)

Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.

Services, Inc. (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 452, 459 [ 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 427 ]; In re Hogan (1986) 187 Cal.App.3d 819, 825 [ 232 Cal.Rptr. 90 ].) In sum, we hold that the Convention does not authorize the issuance of a letter rogatory that has as its purpose the enforcement of a money judgment.

green In Re Bush (2008)

Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.

Bush’s claim rests on a single sentence in In re Hogan (1986) 187 Cal.App.3d 819, 824 [ 232 Cal.Rptr. 90 ] (Hogan): “[I]n setting the release date for an indeterminate sentence, [the Board] performs the same function as does the trial court in ordering a determinate sentence—it fixes a term of definite duration.” Although Bush interprets this sentence to mean that an indeterminate sentence becomes a determinate sentence when the base term is set by the Board, it does not sta…