People v. Cash (2009)
green
· 26 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Anderson (2015)
Id. at 219-20 . 13 But most courts that have examined whether police have seized a parked vehicle under similar cirenmstances have agreed with the Kansas Supreme Court that "(flew, if any, reasonable citizens, while parked, would simply drive away and assume that the police, in turning on the emergency flashers, would be communicating sométhing other than for them to remain." State v. Morris, 276 Kan. 11 , 72 P.3d 570, 577 (2003) (citation omitted); see also id. at 578 (noti…
"[Wle note that the cases are legion in other jurisdictions in which the activation of lights or siren or both has been deemed a sufficient show of authority to result in the seizure of a parked car."
green
People v. Weiss (2022)
Reviewing courts employ this deferential standard for factual issues because the trial judge “is in a better position to determine the weight and credibility of the witnesses, observe their demeanor, and resolve conflicts in the witnesses’ testimony.” People v. Cash, 396 Ill.
green
People v. Colquitt (2013)
In People v. Cash, 396 Ill.
green
People v. Colquitt (2013)
In People v. Cash, 396 Ill.
green
People v. Lopez (2013)
Cosby, 231 Ill. 2d at 281-82 ; Luedemann, 222 Ill. 2d at 553 (citing People v. Murray, 137 Ill. 2d 382, 390-91 (1990) (noting that “[i]n the absence of [the Mendenhall factors or] some such evidence, otherwise inoffensive contact between a member of the public and the police cannot, as a matter of law, amount to a seizure of that person” (internal quotation marks omitted))). ¶ 31 Defendant cites People v. Cash for the proposition that “a seizure occurs either where physical …
citing Village of Mundelein v. 341 Ill. App. 3d 842, 848 (2003)
green
State v. Anderson (2015)
Id. at 219–20. ¶13 But most courts that have examined whether police have seized a parked vehicle under similar circumstances have agreed with the Kansas Supreme Court that “[f]ew, if any, reasonable citizens, while parked, would simply drive away and assume that the police, in turning on the emergency flashers, would be communicating something other than for them to remain.” State v. Morris, 72 P.3d 570, 577 (Kan. 2003) (citation omitted); see also id. at 578 (noting that “…
“[W]e note that the cases are legion in other jurisdictions in which the activation of lights or siren or both has been deemed a sufficient show of authority to result in the seizure of a parked car.”