State v. Sampson (1978)
green
· 13 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Crocker (1981)
See M.R.Crim.P. 16(cX2); State v. Sampson, Me., 387 A.2d 213, 216 (1978); State v. Davenport, supra at 9-10 .
green
State v. Saucier (1980)
State v. Sampson, Me., 387 A.2d 213, 216 (1978).
green
State v. Mills (2006)
A juvenile conviction that is not admissible pursuant to Rule 609(d) may remain admissible for impeachment purposes “if it demonstrates a strong tendency for bias.” State v. Ouellette, 544 A.2d 761, 763 (Me.1988); see also Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 317-19 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); 5 State v. Sampson, 387 A.2d 213, 217 (Me.1978). [¶ 11] Mills argues that our interpretation of Davis in Ouellette and Sampson is “subject to an unconstitutionally narrow readin…
green
State v. Boutilier (1981)
Clair, Me., 418 A.2d 184, 189 (1980); State v. Sampson, Me., 387 A.2d 213, 216 (1978).
green
State v. Wells (1980)
It would seem that the defendant did not adequately save the issue for appellate cognizance, and that the error, if error there was, must be viewed in the context of a review “for obvious error.” See State v. Sampson, Me., 387 A.2d 213, 217 (1978).
green
State v. Mitchell (1979)
This ruling correctly reflects existing Maine law interpreting Rule 609, M.R.Evid., as recently decided in State v. Sampson, Me., 387 A.2d 213, 216-17 (1978).
green
State v. Ouellette (1988)
See State v. Sampson, 387 A.2d 213, 217 (Me.1978).