How cited: Longoria v. Lasater · Go Syfert

Longoria v. Lasater (2009)

green · 110 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 47 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201020182026
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
“A trespass to try title action ‘is the method of determining title to lands.’” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009) (quoting Tex. Prop.
green Ries v. Archer (2024)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Legal title to property is “title that evidences apparent ownership but does not necessarily signify full and complete title or a beneficial interest.” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. _____________________ 7 The grantors on the 2006 and 2014 deeds were listed as, respectively, the “Richard K.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
CODE ANN. § 22.001(a) (West 2014); Martin v. Amerman, 133 S.W.3d 262, 265 (Tex. 2004) (trespass to try title is typical method used to “clear problems in chains of title”); Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
Huckabee v. Time Warner Entm’t Co., 19 S.W.3d 413, 420 (Tex.2000); Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 162-63 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
DISCUSSION As previously noted, in their first motion for summary judgment, the only ground asserted by the Daughters was that “a dead person cannot be a beneficiary of a trust.” In support of this argument in their motion, the Daughters cited Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 167 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) and Section 112, comment f of the Restatement (Second) -4- 04-19-00129-CV of Trusts.
Quote Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., Inc. v. FMF Assocs. 1990-A, Ltd., 249 S.W.3d 380 , 389 & n.32 (Tex. 2008); Doherty v. Old Place, Inc., 316 S.W.3d 840 , 15 In his response, Izen recognized: “The fairness of the price received, whether the consideration paid was ‘inadequate’ or even ‘grossly inadequate,’ must be determined as of the date of sale and the condition of the property and title being sold.” 16 See Longoria, 292 S.W.3d at 165 (“An owner of a superior equitable title may recover in a trespass t…
“An owner of a superior equitable title may recover in a trespass to try title action if the record shows the equitable title is superior to the defendant’s bare legal title.”
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (citing Black’s Law Dictionary at ,1523 (8th ed.2004)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet) 15, 17 Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. 39 S. W. 3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001) 25 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Adcock, 412 S.W. 3d 492 (Tex. 2013). . . 9, 20 Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. Civ.
pet. den.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Under Chapter 209, an “owner” is “a person who holds record title to property in a residential subdivision . . . .” Id. § 209.002(6). “‘Record title’ means title as it appears in the public records after the deed is properly recorded.” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (citing BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY at 1523 (8th ed. 2004)).
Quote Authority · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Longoria, 292 S.W.3d at 165 (“A suit to resolve a dispute over title to land is, in effect, a trespass to try title action regardless of the form the action takes and whether legal or equitable -4- 04-12-00417-CV relief is sought.”).
“A suit to resolve a dispute over title to land is, in effect, a trespass to try title action regardless of the form the action takes and whether legal or equitable -4- 04-12-00417-CV relief is sought.”
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Eagle Oil & Gas Co. v. TRO-X, L.P., 619 S.W.3d 699 , 706 (Tex. 2021); City of Houston v. Guthrie, 332 S.W.3d 578, 588 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied); Langoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Section 522(d)(1) provides the federal homestead exemption: as of April 1, 2022, a debtor may exempt “[t]he debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $27,900 in value, in real property or personal property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence . . . .” 1 Legal title is “a title that evidences apparent ownership.” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex.
See Ballingall v. Brown, 226 S.W.2d 165, 170 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1949, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (holding if the pleadings in a trespass-to-try-title action “substantially comply with statutory requirements they are sufficient to support a judgment”); Martin v. McDonnold, 247 S.W.3d 224, 239 (Tex. App.— El Paso 2006, no pet.) (“If a plaintiff’s petition substantially follows the provisions of Rule 783 [of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure] i[t] will be considered sufficient for …
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Our sister court has explained that “record title” is “title as it appears in the public records after the deed is properly recorded,” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (citing Record title, Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004)), and there is no indication that deeds for the lots were ever transferred to the Developer or properly recorded in the County’s records.13 In fact, the testimony established that the Developer never c…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g) (“A suit to resolve a dispute over title to land is, in effect, a trespass to try title action regardless of the form the action takes and whether legal or equitable relief is sought.”).
green Rife v. Kerr (2016)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Thus, “[t]he plain tiffs claim must rest on the strength of its title, not a weakness in its opponent’s title.” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (citing Rogers, 884 S.W.2d at 768 ).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Milner v. Milner, 361 S.W.3d 615, 621 (Tex.2012) (stating that record title typically refers to legal evidence of a person’s ownership rights in property); Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (stating that “ ‘record title’ means title as it appears in the public records after the deed is properly recorded”); Black’s Law Dictionary 1523 (8th ed. 2004) (defining “record title” as “[a] title as it appears in the public records a…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
While “legal title” to property evidences apparent ownership, it “does not necessarily signify full and complete title or a beneficial interest.” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. v. Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211, 215 (Tex. 2003); Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 162 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 168 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied); see RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TRUSTS § 8 cmt. f; RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TRUSTS § 423.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 168 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied); see Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 8 cmt. f; Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 423.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“A suit to resolve a dispute over title to land is, in effect, a trespass to try title action regardless of the form the action takes and whether legal or equitable relief is sought.” Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied); see also Hawk v. E.K.
green Caress v. Lira (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Martin v. Amerman, 133 S.W.3d 262, 265 (Tex.2004); Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Martin v. Amerman, 133 S.W.3d 262, 265 (Tex. 2004); Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Title Co. of El Paso v. Prata, 783 S.W.2d 697, 702 (Tex. App.— El Paso 1989, writ denied); see also Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (holding that “‘perfect title’ means fee simple title or ‘a title that does not disclose a patent defect that may require a lawsuit to defend it . . . title that is good both at law and in equity’”) The pivotal question then is whether Romero and Grab established that they also had legal title a…
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Longoria, 292 S.W.3d at 165 ; Hawk, 107 S.W.3d at 84 ; Bell, 945 S.W.2d at 294 .
green Milner v. Milner (2012)
Cited · Tex. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (citing BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 1523 (8th ed.2004)).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156 , 165 n. 7 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
Appraisal Dist. v. Signature Flight Support Corp., 140 S.W.3d 833, 840 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, no pet.); see also Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (noting that equitable title is title that “indicates a beneficial interest in property and that gives the holder the right to acquire formal legal title”); City of Houston v. Guthrie, 332 S.W.3d 578, 588 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (“‘Equitable title’ is a ri…
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
Brumley, 616 S.W.3d at 832 (quoting Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. State, 133 S.W.2d 767, 770 (1939)); see Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (“An owner of a superior equitable title may recover in a trespass to try title action if the record shows the equitable title is superior to the defendant’s bare legal title.”).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.––San Antonio 2009, 14 pet. denied) (op. on reh’g) (explaining title types: record, legal, and equitable).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (citing BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1523 (8th ed. 2004)).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see, e.g.
I-10 Colony, Inc. v. Chao Kuan Lee, 393 S.W.3d 467, 476 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, pet. denied); see e.g., Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied); Hawk v. E.K.
green Roberson v. Odom (2017)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria, 292 S.W.3d at 165 . .
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Essex Crane Rental Corp. v. Carter, 371 S.W.3d 366, 388 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, pet. denied) (“A suit to clear title or quiet title—also known as a suit to remove cloud from title—relies on the invalidity of the defendant’s claim to the property.”) (citing Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156 , 165 n.7 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied)).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See addition to contesting Dupnik's arguments, Longoria, 292 S.W.3d at 165 ("A suit to resolve -2- Dupnik v. Hermis (Tex. App., 2013) a dispute over title to land is, in effect, a trespass Page 6 to try title action regardless of the form the action takes and whether legal or equitable may not attack a facially valid, and thus voidable, deed merely by pleading in equity.
Cited · Tex. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 33 2009, pet. denied) (citing BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1523 (8th ed. 2004)).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 33 2009, pet. denied) (citing BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1523 (8th ed. 2004)).
green Sneed v. Webre (2015)
Cited · Tex. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (citing Black’s Law Dictionary 1523 (8th ed. 2004)).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater , 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) ("'[R]ecord title' means title as it appears in the public records after the deed is properly recorded."); Richards v. Suckle , 871 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, no pet.) ("A good faith purchaser for value will prevail over the holder of prior equitable title.").
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (“‘[R]ecord title’ means title as it appears in the public records after the deed is properly recorded.”); Richards v. Suckle, 871 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 13 Did the trial court err by ordering partition by sale?
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) (“‘[R]ecord title’ means title as it appears in the public records after the deed is properly recorded.”); Richards v. Suckle, 871 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, no pet.) (“A good faith purchaser for value will prevail over the holder of prior equitable title.”).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater , 292 S.W.3d 156, 165 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2009, pet. denied) ("'[R]ecord title' means title as it appears in the public records after the deed is properly recorded."); Richards v. Suckle , 871 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, no pet.) ("A good faith purchaser for value will prevail over the holder of prior equitable title.").
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater, 292 S.W.3d 156 , 165 n. 7 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Longoria v. Lasater , 292 S.W.3d 156 , 165 n.7 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g. , Longoria v. Lasater , 292 S.W.3d 156 , 165 n.7 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, pet. denied); Fricks v. Hancock , 45 S.W.3d 322, 327 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.); McCammon v. Ischy , No. 03-06-00707-CV, 2010 WL 1930149 , at *7 (Tex. App.—Austin May 12, 2010, pet. denied) (mem. op.). [2] Even assuming for argument’s sake that Groves’s suit is properly characterized as a trespass to try title suit, the rule that a claimant in such an action must base her cl…