How cited: Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. · Go Syfert

Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. (2002)

green · 142 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200220142026
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 , 773 N.E.2d 641, 645 (2002).
green People v. Haley (2026)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
In re M.M., 2016 IL 119932, ¶ 21 ; DG Enterprises, LLC-Will Tax, LLC v. Cornelius, 2015 IL 118975, ¶ 31 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 (2002). ¶ 50 Based on our reading of subsection (a)(1) of the home invasion statute (720 ILCS 5/19- 6(a)(1) (West 2022)), we find that it requires two separate acts.
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“The critical inquiry is whether the allegations of the complaint, when considered in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.” Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“The critical inquiry is whether the allegations of the complaint, when considered in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.” Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
green Smith v. Jones (2025)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002) (in reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint, we accept as true all well-pleaded facts and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from those facts).
in reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint, we accept as true all well-pleaded facts and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from those facts
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002). ¶ 22 The petitioners requested that the circuit court enter its section 2-615 dismissal with prejudice and conceded the insufficiency of their citation to recover when viewed under a presumption of a gift.
green Masters v. Murphy (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
See De Jesus -3- v. Policemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 2019 IL App (1st) 190486, ¶ 16 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
green Masters v. Murphy (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
See De Jesus v. Policemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 2019 IL App (1st) 190486, ¶ 16 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“The critical inquiry is whether the allegations of the complaint, when considered in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.” Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
green In re M.M. (2017)
Rule Authority · Ill.
DG Enterprises, LLC-Will Tax, LLC v. Cornelius, 2015 IL 118975, ¶ 31 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 (2002).
green Doe v. Doe (2017)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002). ¶ 10 As our supreme court held in Turcios, when a plaintiff seeks to recover damages predicated upon a decedent’s suicide, allegedly brought about through the acts of the defendant, “the plaintiff must do more than plead facts which, if proven, would establish that the defendant’s conduct was a cause in fact of the suicide.” Turcios, 2015 IL 117962, ¶ 40 . “[A] plaintiff must plead facts demonstrating that the suici…
green In re M.M. (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill.
DG Enterprises, LLC-Will Tax, LLC v. Cornelius, 2015 IL 118975, ¶ 31 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 (2002).
green In re M.M. (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill.
DG Enterprises, LLC-Will Tax, LLC v. Cornelius, 2015 IL 118975, ¶ 31 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 (2002).
green In re M.M. (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill.
DG Enterprises, LLC-Will Tax, LLC v. Cornelius, 2015 IL 118975, ¶ 31 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 (2002).
green Doe v. Doe (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002). ¶ 10 As our supreme court held in Turcios, when a plaintiff seeks to recover damages predicated upon a decedent's suicide, allegedly brought about through the acts of the defendant, "the plaintiff must do more than plead facts which, if proven, would establish that the defendant's conduct was a cause in fact of the suicide." Turcios, 2015 IL 1179623, ¶ 40. "[A] plaintiff must -4- No. 1-15-3272 plead facts demonstrat…
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Vitro, 209 Ill. 2d at 81 (citing Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002), and Weatherman, 186 Ill. 2d at 491 ).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Vitro, 209 Ill. 2d at 81 , 806 N.E.2d at 634 , citing Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 , 773 N.E.2d 641, 644 (2002), and Weatherman, 186 Ill. 2d at 491 , 713 N.E.2d at 552 .
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Vitro, 209 Ill. 2d at 81 , 806 N.E.2d at 634 , citing Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 , 773 N.E.2d 641, 644 (2002), and Weatherman, 186 Ill. 2d at 491 , 713 N.E.2d at 552 .
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hadley, 224 Ill. 2d at 370 ; Taddeo, 216 Ill. 2d at 595 ; Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
People v. A Parcel of Property Commonly Known as 1945 North 31st Street, Decatur, Macon County, Illinois, 217 Ill. 2d 481, 501 (2005); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87-88 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
People v. A Parcel of Property Commonly Known as 1945 North 31st Street, Decatur, Macon County, Illinois, 217 Ill. 2d 481, 501 (2005); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87-88 (2002).
green Loman v. Freeman (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
green Loman v. Freeman (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
green Karas v. Strevell (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill.
On review, the question is “whether the allegations of the complaint, when construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to establish a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.” Vitro v. Mihelcic, 209 Ill. 2d 76, 81 (2004); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
green Karas v. Strevell (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill.
On review, the question is “whether the allegations of the complaint, when construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to establish a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.” Vitro v. Mihelcic, 209 Ill. 2d 76, 81 (2004); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
Taddeo v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund, 216 Ill. 2d 590, 595 (2005); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
Taddeo v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund, 216 Ill. 2d 590, 595 (2005); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
Relying on this court’s decisions in Lanier v. Associates Finance, Inc., 114 Ill. 2d 1, 18 (1986) (finding compliance with disclosure requirements of federal Truth in Lending Act as interpreted by Federal Reserve Board staff to be a defense to liability under the Consumer Fraud Act), Jackson v. South Holland Dodge, Inc., 197 Ill. 2d 39, 47 (2001) (finding compliance with federal statute to be a defense to liability under the Consumer Fraud Act), and Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge…
recognizing state policy against extending consumer disclosure requirements beyond those mandated by federal law
Rule Authority · Ill.
When a claim has been dismissed for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to section 2B615 of the Code, the critical inquiry on review is Awhether the allegations of the complaint, when construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to establish a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.@ Vitro v. Mihelcic, 209 Ill. 2d 76, 81 (2004); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
When a claim has been dismissed for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Code, the critical inquiry on review is “whether the allegations of the complaint, when construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to establish a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.” Vitro v. Mihelcic, 209 Ill. 2d 76, 81 (2004); Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
Relying on this court’s decisions in Lanier v. Associates Finance, Inc. , 114 Ill. 2d 1, 18 (1986) (finding compliance with disclosure requirements of federal Truth in Lending Act as interpreted by Federal Reserve Board staff to be a defense to liability under the Consumer Fraud Act), Jackson v. South Holland Dodge, Inc. , 197 Ill. 2d 39, 47 (2001) (finding compliance with federal statute to be a defense to liability under the Consumer Fraud Act), and Jarvis v. South Oak Dod…
recognizing state policy against extending consumer disclosure requirements beyond those mandated by federal law
green Kelley v. Carbone (2005)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. , 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
green Kelley v. Carbone (2005)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
The FTC Holder Notice must appear on consumer credit contracts, and it provides that “ ‘[a]ny holder of this consumer credit contract is subject to all claims and defenses which the debtor could assert against the seller of goods or services obtained pursuant hereto or with the proceeds hereof.’ ” E.g., Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill.2d 81 , 265 Ill.Dec. 877 , 773 N.E.2d 641, 645 (2002) (quoting the FTC Holder Notice) (internal capitalization omitted).
quoting the FTC Holder Notice
green People v. Gaylord (2005)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 , 773 N.E.2d 641, 645 (2002).
green Young v. Bryco Arms (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. , 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
green Young v. Arms (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. , 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. , 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).
green Vitro v. Mihelcic (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002); Weatherman, 186 Ill. 2d at 491 .
green Vitro v. Mihelcic (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. , 201 Ill. 2d 81, 86 (2002); Weatherman , 186 Ill. 2d at 491 .
Quote Authority · Ill. · signal: see
(Emphases added.) 15 ILCS 205/4 (West 2000); see Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 (2002) (“Generally, use of the conjunctive ‘and’ between two or more statutory elements indicates that the legislature intended that all of the elements must be satisfied in order to comply with the statute”).
“Generally, use of the conjunctive ‘and’ between two or more statutory elements indicates that the legislature intended that all of the elements must be satisfied in order to comply with the statute”
Quote Authority · Ill. · signal: see
(Emphases added.) 15 ILCS 205/4 (West 2000); see Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc. , 201 Ill. 2d 81, 87 (2002) (“Generally, use of the conjunctive ‘and’ between two or more statutory elements indicates that the legislature intended that all of the elements must be satisfied in order to comply with the statute”).
“Generally, use of the conjunctive ‘and’ between two or more statutory elements indicates that the legislature intended that all of the elements must be satisfied in order to comply with the statute”
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 201 Ill. 2d 81, 85 (2002).