Huber v. Niagara MacH. and Tool Works (1988)
green
· 68 citation events
across 9 courts.
Showing the 16 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Royce Young v. Pollock Engineering Group, Inc. Pollock Research and Design, Inc. Computech, a Sole Proprietor… (2005)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 466 (Minn.1988) (en banc).
green
Royce Young v. Pollock Engineering (2005)
Huber v. Niagra Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 466 (Minn. 1988) (en banc).
en banc
green
Timothy Gamradt Carla Gamradt v. Federal Laboratories, Inc. MacE Securities International Defense Technology … (2004)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn.1988); Harmon Contract Glazing, Inc. v. Libby-Owens-Ford Co., 493 N.W.2d 146, 151 (Minn.Ct.App.1992).
green
Timothy Gamradt v. Federal Laboratories (2004)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn. 1988); Harmon Contract Glazing, Inc. v. Libby-Owens-Ford Co., 493 N.W.2d 146, 151 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992).
green
Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Gomez (2001)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 468 (Minn.1988).
green
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. (2017)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn. 1988) (failure to warn); Bilotta v. Kelley Co., 346 N.W.2d 616, 624 (Minn. 1984) (design defect); see also Domagala v. Rolland, 805 N.W.2d 14, 22 (Minn. 2011) (describing the issue of duty as a “threshold question” to be determined before liability is considered).
failure to warn
green
Drager Ex Rel. Gutzman v. Aluminum Industries Corp. (1993)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn.1988).
green
Markel v. Douglas Technologies Group, Inc. (2019)
The Failure to Warn Claims The Court will now address Markel’s final two, non-products-liability claims: “failure to warn” and “post-sale failure to warn.” See Huber v. Niagra Mach. and Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn. 1988) (noting that “failure to warn is a cause of action separate from defective design”). 1.
noting that “failure to warn is a cause of action separate from defective design”
green
Holowaty v. McDonald's, Corp. (1998)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn.1988).
green
Minter-Weisman Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue (1994)
Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn.1988); see Minn.R. 1400.5500(k) (1991) (permitting agencies to make summary affirmances).
green
Volter v. C. Schmidt Co. (1991)
Cf. Hill v. Wilmington Chemical Corp., 279 Minn. 336, 341 , 156 N.W.2d 898, 902 (Minn.1968).” Huber, supra, at 468, fn. 2 .
green
Hart v. FMC Corp. (1989)
Huber v. Niagara Machine and Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn.1988).
green
Hesselgrave v. Harrison (1989)
Huber v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467 (Minn.1988).
green
Tingey v. Radionics (2006)
See, e.g., Huber v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 467-68 (Minn.1988). “[Liability for failure to instruct or warn attaches only if the risks presented by the product could have been reduced by the adoption of reasonable instructions or warnings....
green
Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co. (1991)
See Huber v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 468 (Minn.1988).
green
Gorath v. Rockwell International, Inc. (1989)
See Huber v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 430 N.W.2d 465, 468 (Minn.1988).