How cited: Behrens v. Harrah's Illinois Corp. · Go Syfert

Behrens v. Harrah's Illinois Corp. (2006)

green · 63 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
green Barclay v. Briscoe (2012)
Quote Authority · Md. · 6 citations in this opinion
Corp., 366 Ill.App.3d 1154 , 304 Ill.Dec. 303 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (2006) (“An employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary.”); Brewster v. Rush-Presbyterian-St.
“An employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary.”
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see, e.g. · 3 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Behrens v. Harrah's Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.App.3d 1154, 1157 , 304 Ill.Dec. 303 , 852 N.E.2d 553 (2006) ("[a]n employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary").
"[a]n employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary"
green Strickland v. Kotecki (2009)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 3 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 1154, 1156 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 555 (2006).
green Williams v. Manchester (2007)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 3 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 260, 264 (1993) (“In order to maintain a claim under the Act, plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) defendant owed a duty to decedent; (2) defendant breached that duty; (3) the breach of duty proximately caused decedent’s death; and pecuniary damages arising therefrom to persons designated under the Act”), with Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
“To properly plead an action based in negligence, plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to establish that defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff, that defendant breached that duty, and that the breach was the proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries”
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
“[a]n employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary”
green Shank v. Fields (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 1154, 1157-58 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (2006).
green Benitez v. Bogucki (2024)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (Ill.
Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App.
Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill App 3d 1154, 1159, 852 NE2d 553, 558 (2006) (observing that “the dissent in Faverty is better reasoned” and that the “decision of the Oregon appel- late court stands alone as an aberration in negligence law”); Barclay v. Briscoe, 427 Md 270, 301-02 & n 17, 47 A3d 560, 579 (2012) (recognizing that “the Faverty case has been widely criticized” and observing that the “Faverty court’s failure to adequately define the nature and scope o…
observing that “the dissent in Faverty is better reasoned” and that the “decision of the Oregon appel- late court stands alone as an aberration in negligence law”
green Orozco v. Edgar (2023)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Indeed, rejecting an analogous argument, the appellate court in Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Defendant asserts the trial court properly allowed defendant’s motion to dismiss all counts of the second amended complaint. ¶ 26 A section 2-615 motion to dismiss “should not be granted unless it clearly appears that no set of facts could ever be proved that would entitle the plaintiffs to recover.” Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
citing Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co., 89 Ill. 2d 273 (1982)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Defendant asserts the trial court properly allowed defendant’s motion to dismiss all counts of the second amended complaint. ¶ 26 A section 2-615 motion to dismiss “should not be granted unless it clearly appears that no set of facts could ever be proved that would entitle the plaintiffs to recover.” Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
citing Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co., 89 Ill. 2d 273 (1982)
Rule Authority · Tex.
Corp., 366 Ill.App.3d 1154 , 304 Ill.Dec. 303 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 557 (2006) (casino worker); Baggett, 758 So.2d at 333-34 (carpenter); Trusiani v. Cumberland & York Dist., Inc., 538 A.2d 258, 262 (Me.1988) (delivery truck driver); Lesser v. Nordstrom, 96-8121, 1998 WL 480832 , at *3-6 (E.D.Pa.
department store employee
green Shank v. Fields (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 1154, 1157-58 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (2006).
green Williams v. Manchester (2007)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 260, 264 (1993) ("In order to maintain a claim under the Act, plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) defendant owed a duty to decedent; (2) defendant breached that duty; (3) the breach of duty proximately caused decedent's death; and pecuniary damages arising therefrom to persons designated under the Act"), with Behrens v. Harrah's Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
"To properly plead an action based in negligence, plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to establish that defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff, that defendant breached that duty, and that the breach was the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries"