Behrens v. Harrah's Illinois Corp. (2006)
green
· 63 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 15 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Barclay v. Briscoe (2012)
Corp., 366 Ill.App.3d 1154 , 304 Ill.Dec. 303 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (2006) (“An employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary.”); Brewster v. Rush-Presbyterian-St.
“An employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary.”
green
Dowe v. Birmingham Steel Corp. (2011)
See, e.g., Behrens v. Harrah's Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.App.3d 1154, 1157 , 304 Ill.Dec. 303 , 852 N.E.2d 553 (2006) ("[a]n employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary").
"[a]n employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary"
green
Strickland v. Kotecki (2009)
App. 3d 1154, 1156 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 555 (2006).
green
Williams v. Manchester (2007)
App. 3d 260, 264 (1993) (“In order to maintain a claim under the Act, plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) defendant owed a duty to decedent; (2) defendant breached that duty; (3) the breach of duty proximately caused decedent’s death; and pecuniary damages arising therefrom to persons designated under the Act”), with Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
“To properly plead an action based in negligence, plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to establish that defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff, that defendant breached that duty, and that the breach was the proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries”
green
Dowe v. Birmingham Steel Corporation (2011)
See, e.g., Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
“[a]n employer should be able to presume that the person in the best position to avoid driving while excessively fatigued, the employee, will either ask for a ride from someone or pull off the roadway and rest if necessary”
green
Shank v. Fields (2007)
App. 3d 1154, 1157-58 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (2006).
green
Benitez v. Bogucki (2024)
Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (Ill.
green
Derby v. Columbia County (2024)
Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill App 3d 1154, 1159, 852 NE2d 553, 558 (2006) (observing that “the dissent in Faverty is better reasoned” and that the “decision of the Oregon appel- late court stands alone as an aberration in negligence law”); Barclay v. Briscoe, 427 Md 270, 301-02 & n 17, 47 A3d 560, 579 (2012) (recognizing that “the Faverty case has been widely criticized” and observing that the “Faverty court’s failure to adequately define the nature and scope o…
observing that “the dissent in Faverty is better reasoned” and that the “decision of the Oregon appel- late court stands alone as an aberration in negligence law”
Corp., 852 N.E.2d 553, 556, 557 (Ill.
green
Orozco v. Edgar (2023)
Indeed, rejecting an analogous argument, the appellate court in Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
green
Falls v. Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers (2017)
Defendant asserts the trial court properly allowed defendant’s motion to dismiss all counts of the second amended complaint. ¶ 26 A section 2-615 motion to dismiss “should not be granted unless it clearly appears that no set of facts could ever be proved that would entitle the plaintiffs to recover.” Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
citing Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co., 89 Ill. 2d 273 (1982)
green
Falls v. Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers (2017)
Defendant asserts the trial court properly allowed defendant’s motion to dismiss all counts of the second amended complaint. ¶ 26 A section 2-615 motion to dismiss “should not be granted unless it clearly appears that no set of facts could ever be proved that would entitle the plaintiffs to recover.” Behrens v. Harrah’s Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
citing Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co., 89 Ill. 2d 273 (1982)
green
Nabors Drilling, U.S.A., Inc. v. Escoto (2009)
Corp., 366 Ill.App.3d 1154 , 304 Ill.Dec. 303 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 557 (2006) (casino worker); Baggett, 758 So.2d at 333-34 (carpenter); Trusiani v. Cumberland & York Dist., Inc., 538 A.2d 258, 262 (Me.1988) (delivery truck driver); Lesser v. Nordstrom, 96-8121, 1998 WL 480832 , at *3-6 (E.D.Pa.
department store employee
green
Shank v. Fields (2007)
App. 3d 1154, 1157-58 , 852 N.E.2d 553, 556 (2006).
green
Williams v. Manchester (2007)
App. 3d 260, 264 (1993) ("In order to maintain a claim under the Act, plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) defendant owed a duty to decedent; (2) defendant breached that duty; (3) the breach of duty proximately caused decedent's death; and pecuniary damages arising therefrom to persons designated under the Act"), with Behrens v. Harrah's Illinois Corp., 366 Ill.
"To properly plead an action based in negligence, plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to establish that defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff, that defendant breached that duty, and that the breach was the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries"