State v. Robinson (1988)
green
· 208 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 21 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Edmunds, Audrey A. v. Deppisch, Jodine (2002)
Conceivably the chaplain might have been qualified as an expert witness to offer an opinion on this matter, cf. State v. Robinson, 431 N.W.2d 165, 167-68 (Wis. 1988); a chaplain assigned to a hospital is probably as much an expert on the characteristic demeanor of persons in the extremity of grief as a worker at a rape crisis center is an expert on the characteristic demeanor of victims of sex- ual assault, as held in the Robinson case.
green
Audrey A. Edmunds v. Jodine Deppisch (2002)
Conceivably the chaplain might have been qualified as an expert witness to offer an opinion on this matter, cf. State v. Robinson, 146 Wis.2d 315 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 167-68 (1988); a chaplain assigned to a hospital is probably as much an expert on the characteristic demeanor of persons in the extremity of grief as a worker at a rape crisis center is an expert on the characteristic demeanor of victims of sexual assault, as held in the Robinson case.
green
State v. DeSantis (1989)
The trial court concluded that evidence on this issue was relevant and that it would "assist the jury in the determination of a fact that they are required to make." 2 The sexual assault counselor's testimony is admissible under State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 333 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 171-72 (1988).
green
Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc. (2011)
(Paragraphing altered.) See also State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 329 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 170 (1988) (Offer of proof requires an "evidentiary hypothesis underpinned by a sufficient statement of facts to enable [a] court to conclude with reasonable confidence that the evidentiary hypothesis could be sustained."). ¶ 48.
Offer of proof requires an "evidentiary hypothesis underpinned by a sufficient statement of facts to enable [a] court to conclude with reasonable confidence that the evidentiary hypothesis could be sustained."
green
State v. Obeta (2011)
Sept. 19, 2008) (finding that a police officer’s testimony about delayed reporting was expert testimony and was not admitted in error); Key v. State, 765 S.W.2d 848, 850 (Tex.App.1989) (admitting expert testimony about the categories of rapists and victims’ typical responses to each type of rape because such evidence was helpful to the jury); State v. Kinney, 171 Vt. 239 , 762 A.2d 833, 842-43 (2000) ("[E]xpert evidence of rape trauma syndrome and the associated typical beha…
allowing expert testimony about post-rape flat affect because it “assisted the jury in understanding reactions with which it perhaps was not familiar”
green
Kuklinski v. Rodriguez (1996)
State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 329 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 170 (1988).
green
State v. LA BINE (1995)
State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 330 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 170 (1988).
green
State v. Donner (1995)
State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 332 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 171 (1988).
green
State v. Verstoppen (1994)
It is recognized that a trial court in an exercise of its discretion may reasonably reach a conclusion which another . . . court may not reach, but it must be a decision which a reasonable ... court could [reach]...." State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 330 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 170 (1988).
green
State v. Alberico (1993)
App. 1988); State v. Moran, 151 Ariz. 378, 382 , 728 P.2d 248, 252 (1986); People v. Bledsoe, 36 Cal.3d 236 , 203 Cal. Rptr. 450, 460-61 , 681 P.2d 291, 301 (1984) (in bank); People v. Fasy, 829 P.2d 1314, 1317 (Colo. 1992); Wheat v. State, 527 A.2d 269, 274 (Del. 1987); State v. Batangan, 71 Haw. 552 , 799 P.2d 48, 52 (1990); State v. Roles, 122 Idaho 138, 146 , 832 P.2d 311, 319 (Ct.App. 1992); State v. Gettier, 438 N.W.2d 1, 5 (Iowa 1989); Commonwealth v. Mamay, 407 Mass.…
green
State v. Alberico (1993)
See Sexton v. State, 529 So.2d 1041, 1049 (Ala.Crim.App.1988); State v. Moran, 151 Ariz. 378, 382 , 728 P.2d 248, 252 (1986); People v. Bledsoe, 36 Cal.3d 236 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 450, 460-61 , 681 P.2d 291, 301 (1984) (in bank); People v. Fasy, 829 P.2d 1314, 1317 (Colo.1992); Wheat v. State, 527 A.2d 269, 274 (Del.1987); State v. Batangan, 71 Haw. 552 , 799 P.2d 48, 52 (1990); State v. Roles, 122 Idaho 138, 146 , 832 P.2d 311, 319 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Gettier, 438 N.W.2d 1, …
green
Franzen v. Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Inc. (1992)
We note that the file received contains pages numbered 00001 through 00241, inclusive, but that pages 2-40, 45, 100, 106, 109, 114-17, 119-24, 144-46, 170, 174-76, 191, 193, and 230 were not forwarded to this court. 6 Hereafter the January 30 order. 7 Vincent & Vincent, Inc. v. Spacek, 102 Wis. 2d 266, 270 , 306 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct. App. 1981). 8 State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 330 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 170 (1988). 9 Dyson v. Hempe, 140 Wis. 2d 792, 800 , 413 N.W.2d 379, 382-8…
green
State v. Jensen (1988)
See, State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315 , 431 N.W.2d 165 (1988).
green
State v. James M. Burke (2021)
Hampton v. State, 92 Wis. 2d 450, 459 , 285 N.W.2d 868 (1979); see also State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 333, 335 , 431 N.W.2d 165 (1988) (concluding exposition testimony about reactions of sexual assault victims was permissible to rebut defendant’s attempt to “capitalize on the misconception that all sexual assault victims are emotional following the assault”).
concluding exposition testimony about reactions of sexual assault victims was permissible to rebut defendant’s attempt to “capitalize on the misconception that all sexual assault victims are emotional following the assault”
green
State v. Rhodes (2011)
See State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 332 , 431 N.W.2d 165 (1988); State v. Bolstad, 124 Wis. 2d 576, 584 , 370 N.W.2d 257 (1985); see also State v. Droste, 115 Wis. 2d 48, 58 , 339 N.W.2d 578 (1983).
green
State v. Crochiere (2004)
See State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 330 , 431 N.W.2d 165 (1988).
green
State v. Brown (2003)
See, e.g., State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 329 , 431 N.W.2d 165 (1988) (concluding "that the offer of proof by the defendant did not state an evidentiary hypothesis underpinned by a sufficient statement of facts to enable this court to conclude with reasonable confidence that *139 the evidentiary hypothesis could be sustained"); State v. Padilla, 110 Wis. 2d 414, 430 , 329 N.W.2d 263 (Ct. App. 1982) (" 'An offer of proof need not be syllogistically perfect but it ought t…
concluding "that the offer of proof by the defendant did not state an evidentiary hypothesis underpinned by a sufficient statement of facts to enable this court to conclude with reasonable confidence that *139 the evidentiary hypothesis could be sustained"
green
State v. Jackson (1994)
See State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 330 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 170 (1988).
green
State v. Hollingsworth (1991)
See, e.g., State v. Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d 315, 332-33 , 431 N.W.2d 165, 171 (1988).
green
State v. Matthew W.L. Rolain (2025)
See Verstoppen, 185 Wis. 2d at 741 (stating that we will uphold a circuit court’s exercise of discretion if it is “‘made and based upon the facts appearing in the record’” (quoting Robinson, 146 Wis. 2d at 330 )). ¶22 Second, Rolain asserts that the circuit court relied on the sexual assault and false imprisonment charges at the sentencing after revocation hearing when it determined that the protection of the public required that Rolain’s treatment occur in custody.