In Re Leonard R. (2004)
green
· 22 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200420152026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
CE Design, Ltd. v. The Mortgage Exchange, Inc. (2007)
In re Leonard R., 351 Ill.
considering subsection (a)(5)
green
CE Design, Ltd. v. Mortgage Exchange, Inc. (2007)
In re Leonard R., 351 Ill.
considering subsection (a)(5)
green
In re Marriage of Kostusik (2005)
Miller v. Consolidated Rail Corp. , 173 Ill. 2d 252, 258 , 671 N.E.2d 39, 42-43 (1996); Leonard R. , 351 Ill.
green
In re Parentage of D.S. (2023)
In re Leonard R., 351 Ill.
green
Fisher v. Ostrowski 977 (2020)
In re Leonard R., 351 Ill.
green
In Re Marriage of Kostusik (2005)
App. 3d 172, 174 , 813 N.E.2d 1054, 1056 (2004).
green
Ellis v. AAR Parts Trading Inc. Modified on Denial of Rehearing - replaces original opinion filed 2/4/05 (2005)
P ursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306(c), AAR had 30 days to file a petition for leave to appeal in the appellate court from the trial court's August 17, 2001, order. 166 Ill. 2d R. 306(b); see also In re Leonard R ., 351 Ill.
Illinois courts have held that a motion for reconsideration directed against an interlocutory order will not toll the running of the 30-day deadline for the filing of the appeal under Rule 306
green
Ellis v. AAR Parts Trading, Inc. (2005)
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306(c), AAR had 30 days to file a petition for leave to appeal in the appellate court from the trial court’s August 17, 2001, order. 166 Ill. 2d R. 306(b); see also In re Leonard R., 351 Ill.
Illinois courts have held that a motion for reconsideration directed against an interlocutory order will not toll the running of the 30-day deadline for the filing of the appeal under Rule 306