How cited: Hubble v. O'CONNOR · Go Syfert

Hubble v. O'CONNOR (1997)

green · 163 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 50
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Sharp Electronics Corporation v. Deutsche Financial Services Corporation (2000)
Quote Authority · 4th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 821 (1997) (“An acceptance conditioned on the modification of terms in an offer generally constitutes a rejection of the offer and becomes a counter-offer that the original offeror must accept before a valid contract is established”); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 59 (“A reply to an offer which purports to accept it but is conditional on the offeror’s assent to terms additional to or differ…
“An acceptance conditioned on the modification of terms in an offer generally constitutes a rejection of the offer and becomes a counter-offer that the original offeror must accept before a valid contract is established”
green Sharp Electronics v. Deutsche Financial (2000)
Quote Authority · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See Hubble v. O'Connor, 684 N.E.2d 816, 821 (Ill.
"An acceptance conditioned on the modification of terms in an offer generally constitutes a rejection of the offer and becomes a counter-offer that the original offeror must accept before a valid contract is established"
green In Re Michael J. KRUEGER, Debtor-Appellant (1999)
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Under Illinois law, “[t]he test used to evaluate an estoppel claim is whether, considering all the circumstances of the specific case, conscience and honest dealing require that a party be estopped.” Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , 225 IlLDec. 825, 684 N.E.2d 816, 823 (1997).
green Kellie Auto Sales, Inc. v. Rahbars & Ritters Enterprises, L.L.C. (2007)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
Hubble at 977, 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816 .
green Patel v. McGrath (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 4 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 594, 599 (1993). -4- No. 2--06--0472 Here, contrary to Groshek and similar cases, we hold that, pursuant to the reasoning of Hubble v. O'Connor, 291 Ill.
green Patel v. McGrath (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 4 citations in this opinion
Here, contrary to Groshek and similar cases, we hold that, pursuant to the reasoning of Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green Young v. Allstate Insurance Co. (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 974, 987 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 825-26 (1997).
green Young v. Allstate Insurance (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 974, 987 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 825-26 (1997).
green Crawley v. Hathaway (1999)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
Hubble v. O'Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974, 979 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green EFN Calumet City Properties, LLC v. City of Calumet City (2025)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Further, “[a]n acceptance conditioned on the modification of terms in an offer generally constitutes a rejection of the offer and becomes a counter-offer that the original offeror must accept before a valid contract is established.” Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green Thompson Fine Art, Ltd v. Union League Club of Chicago (2022)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Thompson asked the court to deny the Club’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. 2 The mirror image rule is a “basic rule of contract formation *** requiring that the acceptance strictly comply with the terms set forth in the offer.” Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green Staples v. Chicago Title Land Trust Company (2021)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
According to the arbitrator, “as of January 25, the contract was in force.” ¶ 12 The arbitrator next observed that, although plaintiff’s attorney requested the additional extension to the financing contingency provisions on January 25, 2019, he “did not condition his client’s acceptance of the offer to postpone the closing on [the Sheehans’] agreement to extend the financing contingency period.” Citing to Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green Camelart Limited v. Stonex Group Inc. (2021)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Hubble v. O’Connor, 684 N.E.2d 816, 825 (Ill.
green Wettersten v. Fox (2019)
Quote Authority · N.D. Ill.
App. Ct. 2014) (“The doctrine of judicial estoppel bars a party from making a representation in a case after he has successfully taken a contrary position in another case.”); Hubble v. O’Connor, 684 N.E.2d 816, 823 (Ill.
“Equitable estoppel is a doctrine that is invoked to prevent fraud and injustice. It arises whenever a party, by his word or conduct, reasonably induces another to rely on his representations, leading that person to change his position so as to be injured.”
green Kenall Manufacturing Company v. Cooper Lighting, LLC (2018)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Cir. 2016) (“Three elements must be established for equitable estoppel to bar a patentee’s suit: (1) the patentee, through misleading conduct (or silence), leads the alleged infringer to reasonably infer that the patentee does not intend to enforce its patent against the alleged infringer; (2) the alleged infringer relies on that conduct; and (3) the alleged infringer will be materially prejudiced if the patentee is allowed to proceed with its claim.”) (emphasis added) (inte…
green VC Management, LLC v. Reliastar Life Insurance Co. (2016)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Mem. at 28.) Under Illinois law, “[t]he test used to evaluate an estoppel claim is whether, considering all the circumstances of the specific case, conscience and honest dealing require that a party be estopped.” Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974, 984-85 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 824 (Ill.App.Ct. 1st Dist.1997) (citing Carey v. City of Rockford, 134 Ill.App.3d 217, 218 , 89 IlLDec. 278, 480 N.E.2d 164, 165 (Ill.App.
green Board of Library Trustees v. Board of Library Trustees (2015)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green The Board of Library Trustees of the Village of Midlothian v. The Board of Library Trustees of the Posen Publ… (2015)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hubble v. O'Connor, 291 Ill.
green Nelson v. Quarles and Brady, LLP (2013)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Id. ¶ 65 In the instant case, in his opening brief, plaintiff argued that he adequately alleged the existence of an enforceable agreement. “[C]ontract formation requires only the existence of an offer, an acceptance, and consideration.” Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green Nelson v. Quarles and Brady, LLP (2013)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Id. ¶ 65 In the instant case, in his opening brief, plaintiff argued that he adequately alleged the existence of an enforceable agreement. “[C]ontract formation requires only the existence of an offer, an acceptance, and consideration.” Hubble v. O'Connor, 291 Ill.
green Levin v. Grecian (2013)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Id. at 740-41 (quoting Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 825 (1997)).
green Lincoln National Life Insurance v. TCF National Bank (2012)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Krueger, 192 F.3d at 740 -741 (quoting Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 823 (1997)); see also Geddes, 256 Ill.Dec. 313 , 751 N.E.2d at 1157 .
green Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company v. Sykes (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 987 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 825-26 (1997).
green Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Sykes (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 987 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 825-26 (1997).
green Karris v. US Equities Development, Inc. (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 983 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 832 (1997).
green Karris v. US Equities Development, Inc. (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 983 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 832 (1997).
green AAM/US Bank LLC v. Lake Carroll Ass'n (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
“The test used to evaluate an estoppel claim is whether, considering all the circumstances of the specific case, conscience and honest dealing require that a party be estopped.” Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green In re Application of the County Treasurer (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
"The test used to evaluate an estoppel claim is whether, considering all the circumstances of the specific case, conscience and honest dealing require that a party be estopped." Hubble v. O'Connor, 291 Ill.
green In Re Tewell (2006)
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Ill.
“Under Illinois law, ‘[t]he test used to evaluate an estoppel claim is whether, considering all the circumstances of the specific case, conscience and honest dealing require that a party be estopped.’ ” In re Krueger, 192 F.3d 733, 740 (7th Cir.1999) (quoting Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 823 (1997)).
green Smith v. Molly Maid, Inc. (2006)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 821 (1997). *918 Regarding the first element of the claim, offer and acceptance, the Court finds that although Molly Maid extended an offer of a franchise agreement to Plaintiff via the “Award Letter” on December 11, 2002, Plaintiff never fully accepted the offer.
green City of Collinsville v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 980 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 821 (1997).
green City of Collinsville v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 980 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 821 (1997).
green Wolfram Partnership, Ltd. v. LaSalle National Bank (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Wolfram Partnership, Ltd. v. LaSalle National Bank Modification of December 19, 2001, opinion on Denial of Re… (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Wrobel v. City of Chicago (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Wrobel v. City of Chicago (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Calhoun v. Belt Ry. Co. of Chicago (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Calhoun v. Belt Ry. Co. of Chicago (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance v. Applied Systems, Inc. (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Northbrook Pooperty & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Applied Systems, Inc. (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 974, 979 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 820 (1997).
green Village of Wadsworth v. Kerton (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hubble v. O'Connor , 291 Ill.
green Village of Wadsworth v. Kerton (2000)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green Solo Sales, Inc. v. North America OMCG, Inc. (1998)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green Du Page Airport Authority v. Pryor (1998)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.
green In re Application of DuPage County Collector (1998)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Hubble v. O'Connor , 291 Ill.
green Peoria Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Best Buy Co. (1997)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
E.g., Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , 225 Ill.Dec. 825 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 821 (1 Dist.1997) (citing Loeb v. Gray, 131 Ill.App.3d 793 , 86 Ill.Dec. 775 , 475 N.E.2d 1342 (5 Dist.1985)).
green Aumann Auctions Inc v. Fletcher (2021)
Cited · C.D. Ill. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.App.3d 974, 980 , 684 N.E.2d 816, 821 (Ill.
green Chandra v. Chandra (2016)
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Hubble v. O'Connor, 291 Ill.
green Kellie Auto Sales v. Rahbars Ritters Ents., 06ap-1243 (8-16-2007) (2007)
Cited · Ohio Ct. App. · signal: see
See Noble-Allgire, Attorney Approval Clauses in Residential Real Estate Contracts-Is Half a Loaf Better Than None? (2000), 48 Kan.L.Rev. 339, 374, citing Hubble v. O'Connor (1997), 291 Ill.App.3d 974 , and Kutzin v. Pirnie (1991), 124 N.J. 500 . {¶ 23} Because the attorney approval clauses in Hubble and Kutzin differ dramatically from the broad clause contained in the Purchase Contract here, we find those cases easily distinguishable.
green Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Schulson (1999)
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Hubble v. O’Connor, 291 Ill.