BNS INC. v. Koppers Co., Inc. (1988)

green · 28 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 13

Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

198820072026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green In Re Digex, Inc. Shareholders Litigation (2000)

Rule Authority · Del. Ch. · 2 citations in this opinion

BNS Inc. v. Koppers Co., 683 F.Supp. 458, 469 (D.Del.1988) (preliminarily upholding the constitutionality of § 203). 96 .

green Amanda Acquisition Corp. v. Universal Foods Corp. (1989)

Rule Authority · E.D. Wis. · 2 citations in this opinion

The MITE plurality’s preemption analysis, as ostensibly applied by the CTS Court, was summarized in BNS Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc., 683 F.Supp. 458, 469 (D.Del.1988): First, does the statute protect independent shareholders from coercion?

green Airgas, Inc. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. (2010)

Rule Authority · Del.

See SWT Acquisition Corp. v. TW Servs., Inc., 700 F.Supp. 1323, 1329 (D.Del.1988) ("[T]he [] board is staggered [and] thereby preclud[es] [outside] control for two years.”); BNS Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc., 683 F.Supp. 458, 470 (D.Del.1988) ("[A] staggered board delays shifts of control for two years.”). 21 .

green Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp. (1995)

Rule Authority · Del.

One federal court has described the judicial role in assessing defensive measures in the hostile tender offer context pursuant to Unocal as "an intricate composite of deference to the business expertise of the directors and close scrutiny of incumbent management decisions.” BNS, Inc. v. Koppers Co., 683 F.Supp. 458, 473 (D.Del.1988). 15 .

green WLR Foods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc. (1994)

Rule Authority · W.D. Va.

Mar. 23, 1989) ("[T]he Williams Act preempts state anti-takeover statutes which deprive a hostile bidder of a ‘meaningful opportunity for success.'"); West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Parley, Inc., 711 F.Supp. 1096, 1103 (N.D.Ga.1989) (finding preemption if a statute leaves a hostile offeror with no meaningful opportunity for success absent approval from the board that it seeks to replace); BNS, Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc., 683 F.Supp. 458, 469 (D.Del.1988) (creating the meaningf…

green West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Farley Inc. (1989)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

See CTS, 107 S.Ct. at 1645-46 ; Hyde Park Partners, L.P. v. Connolly, 839 F.2d 837, 849-50 (1st Cir.1988); BNS Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc., 683 F.Supp. 458, 467 (D.Del.1988); RP Acquisition Corp. v. Staley Continental, Inc., 686 F.Supp. 476, 480 (D.Del.1988).

green Robert M. Bass Group, Inc. v. Evans (1988)

Rule Authority · Del. Ch. · signal: cf.

Cf. BNS, Inc. v. Hoppers Co., 683 F.Supp. 458, 475 (D.Del.1988).

green Wlr Foods, Incorporated v. Tyson Foods, Incorporated (1995)

Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., BNS, Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc., 683 F.Supp. 458, 469 (D.Del.1988) ("[E]ven statutes with substantial deterrent effects on tender offers do not circumvent Williams Act goals, so long as hostile offers which are beneficial to target shareholders have a meaningful opportunity for success."); West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Farley, Inc., 711 F.Supp. 1096, 1102 (N.D.Ga.1989); RP Acquisition Corp. v. Staley Continental, Inc., 686 F.Supp. 476, 482 (D.Del.1988).

green Amanda Acquisition Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Universal Foods Corporation, Defendants… (1989)

Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see

See BNS, Inc. v. Koppers Co., 683 F.Supp. 458 (D.Del.1988); RP Acquisition Corp. v. Staley Continental, Inc., 686 F.Supp. 476 (D.Del.1988); City Capital Associates L.P. v. Interco, Inc., 696 F.Supp. 1551 (D.Del.), affirmed, 860 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1988).

green Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc. (1995)

Cited (see also) · D. Del. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Black & Decker Corp. v. American Standard Inc., 679 F.Supp. 1183 (D.Del.1988) (challenge to Delaware’s opt-out statute ripe); see also BNS, 683 F.Supp. 458 (same).

green WLR Foods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc. (1995)

Cited (see also) · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., BNS, Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc., 683 F.Supp. 458, 469 (D.Del.1988) (“[E]ven statutes with substantial deterrent effects on tender offers do not circumvent Williams Act goals, so long as hostile offers which are beneficial to target shareholders have a meaningful opportunity for success.”); West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Farley, Inc., 711 F.Supp. 1096, 1102 (N.D.Ga.1989); RP Acquisition Corp. v. Staley Continental, Inc., 686 F.Supp. 476, 482 (D.Del.1988).

green Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc. (1990)

Cited (see also) · Del. · signal: see also

See, e.g., Interco, 551 A.2d at 797 ; see also BNS, Inc. v. Koppers, D.Del., 683 F.Supp. 458 (1988).

green West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Farley Inc. (1988)

Cited · N.D. Ga. · signal: see

See BNS, Inc. v. Koppers Co., 683 F.Supp. 458 (D.Del.1988); RP Acquisition Corp. v. Staley Continental, Inc., 686 F.Supp. 476 (D.Del.1988); City Capital Assoc.