How cited: Dawkins Ex Rel. Estate of Dawkins v. United States · Go Syfert

Dawkins Ex Rel. Estate of Dawkins v. United States (2002)

green · 6 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C. · 3 citations in this opinion
Estate of Dawkins v. United States, 226 F.Supp.2d 750, 759 (M.D.N.C.2002) (citing Cassell, 472 S.E.2d at 772-73 ); see also Lanni v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 42 N.E.3d 542, 550 (Ind.Ct.App.2015) (“[T]o impose liability resulting from breach of assumed duty, it is essential to identify and focus on the specific services undertaken.”).
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
It cited a district court opinion that reached the same conclusion: “the purpose and intent of the FSIS is to ensure food safety, not workplace safety.” Id. at 4 (quoting Dawkins v. United States, 226 F. Supp. 2d 750, 757 (M.D.N.C. 2002).
green Doe v. United States (2019)
Quote Authority · signal: see
See Dawkins v. United States , 226 F.Supp.2d 750 , 755 (M.D.N.C. 2002) ("[T]he North Carolina Supreme Court has not recognized a tort law duty based upon Section 324A of the Restatement of Torts.").
"[T]he North Carolina Supreme Court has not recognized a tort law duty based upon Section 324A of the Restatement of Torts."