Artis v. Greenspan (2002)
green
· 125 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Taylor v. Shinseki (2014)
Co., 593 F.Supp.2d 14, 18 (D.D.C.2008) (noting that “[wjhen deciding a Rule 12(b)(3) motion to dismiss for lack of venue, the court may consider extrinsic evidence”); Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002) (“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject-matter jurisdiction.”) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947)).
green
Futuregen Co. v. Carter (2013)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of ... personal jurisdiction[.]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Flynn v. Ohio Building Restoration, Inc. (2003)
See Artis, 223 F.Supp.2d at 152 (“Failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprives a district court of subject matter jurisdiction.”) (citation omitted).
“Failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprives a district court of subject matter jurisdiction.”
green
Gordon v. Governor of Georgia (2026)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)).
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
Cir. 1987); Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Mills v. Billington (2024)
Cir. 2005)) (internal citations and quotations omitted); see also Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject[] matter jurisdiction.”).
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject[] matter jurisdiction.”
green
Madaket LLC v. Sweet Grace Distilling Company LLC (2024)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of [personal jurisdiction].” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947) (“[W]hen a question of the District Court’s jurisdiction is raised, . . . the court may inquire, by affidavits or otherwise, into the facts as they exist.”)).
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947) (“[W]hen a question of the District Court’s jurisdiction is raised, . . . the court may inquire, by affidavits or otherwise, into the facts as they exist.”)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction[.]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Allen v. Addi (2021)
A court may “consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction,” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149,152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)).
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
green
Saleh v. Bin Zayed Al Nahyan (2021)
Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc., 290 F. Supp. 2d 34, 42 (D.D.C. 2003). 6 “A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction[.]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Al Seraji v. McAleenan (2020)
Because the Court is permitted to “consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction,” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)), those allegations may be “bolstered by . . . affidavits and other written materials as [the plaintiff] can otherwise obtain,” Mwani v. bin Laden, 417 F.3d 1, 7 (D.C.
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
green
Collingsworth v. Drummond Company Incorporated (2020)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction[.]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Corsi v. Stone (2020)
The Court need not, however, “accept the plaintiff’s legal conclusions as true,” id. at 277 , and may consider material outside the pleadings, see Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Corsi v. Stone (2020)
The Court need not, however, “accept the plaintiff’s legal conclusions as true,” id. at 277 , and may consider material outside the pleadings, see Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Alridge v. G4s Secure Solutions (2019)
See Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d, 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue.”).
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue.”
green
Goral v. Dart (2019)
Courts require “[o]bjective and undisputed evidence of administrative bias [that] would render pursuit of an administrative remedy futile.” 15 1-18-1646 (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 154-55 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Bell v. Department of Defense (2018)
A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction, or subject-matter jurisdiction.” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Tower Laboratories, Ltd. v. Lush Cosmetics Limited (2018)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)).
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
green
Foote v. Williams (2017)
Because the Court is permitted to “consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction,” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)), those allegations may be “bolstered by . . . affidavits and other written materials as [the plaintiff] can otherwise obtain,” Mwani v. bin Laden, 417 F.3d 1, 7 (D.C.
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
Because the court is permitted to “consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of ... personal jurisdiction,” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947)), those allegations may be “bolstered by ... affi *412 davits and other written materials as [the plaintiff] can otherwise obtain,” Mwani v. bin Laden, 417 F.3d 1, 7 (D.C.
green
Dumitrescu v. Dyncorp International, LLC (2017)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002), citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947).
green
Satterlee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (2016)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of ... personal jurisdiction.” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002), citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947).
Because the court is permitted to “consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction,” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)), those allegations may be “bolstered by . . . affidavits and other written materials as [the plaintiff] can otherwise obtain,” Mwani v. bin Laden, 417 F.3d 1, 7 (D.C.
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
green
Benton v. Bank of America Corporation (2016)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947)).
green
Hampton v. Comey (2016)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002), citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947).
green
Jimenez v. R & D Masonry, Inc. (2015)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)).
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
green
Naegele v. Albers (2015)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of ... personal jurisdiction[.]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
On a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3), the Court “may consider material outside of the pleadings.” See Williams v. GEICO Corp., 792 F. 6 Supp. 2d 58, 62 (D.D.C. 2011) (citing Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002)).
green
Vasser v. Shinseki (2014)
A court may consider materials outside of the pleadings, see Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002), and because it is a plaintiffs obligation to institute the action in a permissible forum, a plaintiff usually bears the burden of establishing that venue is proper.
green
Artis v. Greenspan (2014)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 155 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Perlmutter v. Varone (2014)
Arbis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Gardner v. Mabus (2014)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947)).
green
Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc. (2014)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002), citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947) (“[W]hen a question of the District Court’s jurisdiction is raised ... the court may inquire, by affidavits or otherwise, into the facts as they exist.”).
green
Barot v. Embassy of the Republic of Zambia (2014)
The “court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of ... personal *29 jurisdiction.” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Taylor v. Veterans Affairs Administration (2014)
Co., 593 F. Supp. 2d 14, 18 (D.D.C. 2008) (noting that “[w]hen deciding a Rule 12(b)(3) motion to dismiss for lack of venue, the court may consider extrinsic evidence”); Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject-matter jurisdiction.”) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)).
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject-matter jurisdiction.”
green
Brodt v. County of Harford (2014)
Co., 593 F.Supp.2d 14, 18 (D.D.C.2008) (noting that “[wjhen deciding a Rule 12(b)(3) motion to dismiss for lack of venue, the court may consider extrinsic evidence”); Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002) (“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject-matter jurisdiction.”) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947)).
green
Santos v. Trustees of Grinnell College (2013)
“A court may [also] consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue.... ” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Fierce v. Sebelius (2013)
Artis v. 1 Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)).
citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n.4 (1947)
green
United States v. Preston (2013)
“A court may [also] consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue.... ” Artis v. *135 Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Demery v. McHugh (2013)
On a motion to dismiss based on improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3), the Court accepts as true a plaintiffs well-pled factual allegations regarding venue but “may consider material outside of the pleadings.” See Williams v. GEICO Corp., 792 F.Supp.2d 58, 62 (D.D.C.2011) (citing Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002)).
green
Jones v. Panetta (2013)
May 6, 2013) (citing Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002)).
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Johnson v. Deloitte Services, LLP (2013)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002), citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947).
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947)).
green
Herbert v. Sebelius (2013)
Co., 593 F.Supp.2d 14, 18 (D.D.C.2008) (noting that “[w]hen deciding a Rule 12(b)(3) motion to dismiss for lack of venue, the court may consider extrinsic evidence”); Gianelli v. Chirkes, 377 F.Supp.2d 49, 51 (D.D.C. 2005), affd, 204 Fed.Appx. 24 (D.C.Cir. 2006); Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002) (“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject-matter jurisdicti…
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of ... personal jurisdiction]).]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).
green
Douglas v. Chariots for Hire (2013)
Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002) (citing Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947)).
green
Futuregen Company v. Carter (2013)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of . . . personal jurisdiction[.]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149, 152 (D.D.C. 2002).
green
Scurlock v. Lappins (2012)
“A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of ... personal jurisdiction[.]” Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F.Supp.2d 149, 152 (D.D.C.2002).