Sherer v. Waier (1978)

green · 15 citation events across 10 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 9

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Smrcka Ex Rel. Smrcka v. Ambach (1983)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion

Cf., Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1047-48 (W.D.Mo.1977); United Handicapped Federation v. Andre, 409 F.Supp. 1297, 1301-02 (D.Minn.1976), vacated on other grounds, 558 F.2d 413 (8th Cir.1977).

green McGuire v. Switzer (1990)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Defendants argue that handicapped individuals do not constitute a suspect class citing Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1048 (W.D.Mo. 1978), Doe v. Koger, 480 F.Supp. 225, 230 (N.D.

green Rollison v. Biggs (1983)

Rule Authority · D. Del.

See Colin K. v. Schmidt, 536 F.Supp. 1375, 1388 (D.R.I.1982); Turillo v. Tyson, 535 F.Supp. at 582 ; Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1048 (W.D.Mo.1978); Doe v. Roger, 480 F.Supp. 225, 230 (N.D.Ind.1979).

green Rhode Island Handicapped Action Committee v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (1982)

Rule Authority · D.R.I.

See Dopico v. Goldschmidt, 518 F.Supp. at 1178 aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 687 F.2d 644 (2d Cir. 1982) (holding that handicapped persons do not constitute a suspect class); Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1047 (W.D.Mo.1978) (same).

green Colin K. v. Schmidt (1982)

Rule Authority · D.R.I.

School District, 587 F.2d 1022 , 1026 (9th Cir. 1978), and because handicapped children do not constitute a suspect class, Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1048 (W.D.Mo.1978); Doe v. Roger, 480 F.Supp. 225, 230 (N.D.Ind.1979) (“seriously doubts” *1389 that mentally handicapped students constitute suspect class), MSC’s alleged “policy or practice” needs only pass the “rational basis” level of equal protection scrutiny.

green Turillo v. Tyson (1982)

Rule Authority · D.R.I.

Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1047 (W.D.Mo.1978).

green H. R. v. Hornbeck (1981)

Rule Authority · D. Maryland

Cal.1979); Stubbs v. Kline, supra; Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1046 (W.D.Mo. 1978) ; Doe v. Colautti, 454 F.Supp. 621, 630 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d, 592 F.2d 704 (3d Cir. 1979) ; Doe v. New York University, 442 F.Supp. 522 (S.D.N.Y.1978).

green Riley v. Ambach (1980)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y

See, e. g., Harris v. Campbell, 472 F.Supp. 51, 54 (E.D.Va.1979); Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1056 (W.D.Mo. 1977).

green Upshur v. Love (1979)

Cited (see also) · N.D. Cal. · signal: see also

See also Sherer v. Waier, 457 F.Supp. 1039, 1047 (W.D.Mo.1977). 12 .