Conagra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transportation, Inc. (2006)

green · 16 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Sarah Williams v. H&B Development, LLC (2024)

Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.

Conagra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transp., Inc., 186 S.W.3d 243, 245 (Ky. App. 2006).

green Charles \Skee\" Bauer v. Roger Bauer (2022)

Rule Authority

An arbitration award may not be set aside for mere errors of law or fact, Smith v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., 253 S.W.2d 629, 630 (Ky. 1952), and “an arbitrator’s resolution of factual disputes and his application of the law are not subject to review by the courts.” Conagra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transp., Inc., 186 S.W.3d 243, 245 (Ky. App. 2006) (citation omitted). 626 S.W.3d at 606-07 (footnotes omitted).

citation omitted

green Louisville and Jefferson County Riverport Authority v. New Albany Main Street Properties, LLC D/B/A Port of L… (2022)

Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.

To be clear, “an arbitrator’s resolution of factual disputes and his application of the law are not subject to review by the courts.” Don Booth of Breland Group v. K&D Builders, Inc., 626 S.W.3d 601 , 607 (Ky. 2021) (quoting Conagra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transp., Inc., 186 S.W.3d 243, 245 (Ky. App. 2006)).

green Don Booth of the Breland Group v. Debbie Lawson of Coldwell bankers/mcmahan (2021)

Rule Authority · Ky.

Gov’t, 134 S.W.3d 558, 562 (Ky. 2004).4 An arbitration award may not be set aside for mere errors of law or fact, Smith v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., 253 S.W.2d 629, 630 (Ky. 1952),5 and “an arbitrator's resolution of factual disputes and his application of the law are not subject to review by the courts.” Conagra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transp., Inc., 186 S.W.3d 243, 245 (Ky. 4 See also KRS 417.160(1); Ison v. Robinson, 411 S.W.3d 766, 770-71 (Ky. App. 2013).

green Meers v. Semonin Realtors (2017)

Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.

We agree with Semo-nin Realtors that Meers is in reality seeking a review of the arbitrator’s findings of fact, which a reviewing court is not permitted to do. “[A]n arbitrator’s resolution of factual disputes and his application of the law are not subject to review by the courts.” ConAgra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transp., Inc., 186 S.W.3d 243, 245 (Ky. App. 2006) (citation omitted).

citation omitted

green Wagner v. Drees Co. (2013)

Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.

Conagra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transp., Inc., 186 S.W.3d 243, 244 (Ky.App.2006) (citing 3D Enters.

green Swetnam Design Construction, Inc. v. Saurer (2012)

Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.

“Without a transcript of the arbitration proceedings, the court was required to assume that the evidence supported the arbitrator’s decision.” Conagra Poultry Co. v. Grissom Transp., Inc., 186 S.W.3d 243, 245 (Ky.App.2006), citing Dillard v. Dillard, 859 S.W.2d 134, 137 (Ky.App.1993).