How cited: Spiegel v. KLRU Endownment Fund · Go Syfert

Spiegel v. KLRU Endownment Fund (2007)

green · 63 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 33 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
Quote Authority · txctapp3 · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Spiegel, 228 S.W.3d at 242 (“[B]y providing that when an agreement meets the requirements of section 6.602, the agreement ‘is binding’ and ‘a party is entitled to judgment’ on it, the statute shows the legislature’s intention that the agreement be binding even in the absence of a judgment incorporating it.”).
“[B]y providing that when an agreement meets the requirements of section 6.602, the agreement ‘is binding’ and ‘a party is entitled to judgment’ on it, the statute shows the legislature’s intention that the agreement be binding even in the absence of a judgment incorporating it.”
Quote Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App.—San Antonio 1946, writ ref’d)). 75 See Spiegel, 228 S.W.3d at 242 (“[B]y providing that when an agreement meets the requirements of section 6.602, the agreement ‘is binding’ and ‘a party is entitled to judgment’ on it, the statute shows the legislature’s intention that the agreement be binding even in the absence of a judgment incorporating it.”). 76 See Tex. Fam.
“[B]y providing that when an agreement meets the requirements of section 6.602, the agreement ‘is binding’ and ‘a party is entitled to judgment’ on it, the statute shows the legislature’s intention that the agreement be binding even in the absence of a judgment incorporating it.”
green Milner v. Milner (2012)
Rule Authority · Tex. · 2 citations in this opinion
Morse v. Morse, 349 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2010, no pet.); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex.App.-Austin 2007, pet. denied); Joyner, 196 S.W.3d at 890 ; Boyd, 67 S.W.3d at 403-05 ; In re Kasschau, 11 S.W.3d 305, 312 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Code Ann. § 6.602; Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund , 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); In re Joyner , 196 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · txctapp15
Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · txctapp3
Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“However, a court is not required to enforce an MSA if it is illegal in nature or was procured by fraud, duress, coercion or other 7 dishonest means.” Triesch v. Triesch, No. 03-15-00102-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 2365 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 8, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); In re Marriage of Joyner, 196 S.W.3d 883, 890 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied)); see Emami, 2022 …
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Accord Morse v. Morse, 349 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Tex. App.— El Paso 2010 , no pet.); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); Joyner, 196 S.W.3d at 890 ; In re Kasschau, 11 S.W.3d 305, 312 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (op. on reh’g); cf. Choksi, 2020 WL 6787410 , at *4 (assuming without deciding that duress is an available defense to the enforcement of an MSA).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Morse v. Morse, 349 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2010, no pet.); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); In re Marriage of Joyner, 196 S.W.3d 883, 890 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied); Boyd v. Boyd, 67 S.W.3d 398 , 403–05 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 7 2002, no pet.); In re Kasschau, 11 S.W.3d 305, 312 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); see also Crowson v. Crowson, No. 03-11-00795-CV, 2013 WL 6665022 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 13, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
However, the Texas 3 In Milner, the supreme court cited to Morse v. Morse, 349 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2010, no pet.); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); In re Marriage of Joyner, 196 S.W.3d 883, 890 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied); Boyd v. Boyd, 67 S.W.3d 398, 403 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.), and In re Kasschau, 11 S.W.3d 305, 312 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). –4– Su…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Toler v. Sanders, 371 S.W.3d 477, 480 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.); Morse v. Morse, 349 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2010, no pet.); Brooks, 257 S.W.3d at 422; Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); In re Joyner, 196 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied); In re Kasschau, 11 S.W.3d 305, 312 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Gamboa v. Gamboa, 383 S.W.3d 263, 273 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, no pet.) (trusts); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied) (wills).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
San Antonio Area Foundation v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Tex. 2000); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 243 (Tex. App. – Austin 2007); Lehman v. Corpus Christi Nat’l Bank, 668 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. 1984).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
With respect to eases involving Section 6.602, Texas appellate courts, including this one, have concluded “that the statute does not require the enforcement of [a mediated settlement agreement] that is illegal in nature or procured by fraud, duress, coercion, or other dishonest means.” Milner v. Milner, 361 S.W.3d 615, 619 (Tex.2012) (citing Morse v. Morse, 349 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2010, no pet.); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex.App.-Austi…
green in Re: Max B. Hanson (2015)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Davis v. Davis, No. 01-12-00701-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 2591 , 4 at *9 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] March 6, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.); Morse v. Morse, 349 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Tex. App.–El Paso 2010, no pet.) (same); Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.–Austin 2007, pet. denied) (holding that MSA is binding in the absence of allegations that it calls for performance of an illegal act or was procured by fraud, duress, coercion, or other dishonest m…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See McDonald, 632 S.W.2d at 638-39 ; see also Olmstead, 383 S.W.3d at 654-55 (spouse who conveys the ownership interest in a policy does not necessarily lose right to receive policy proceeds as designated beneficiary but may lose that right if it is clear from marital property agreement that spouse also intended to surrender any claim to proceeds as designated beneficiary); Spiegel, 228 S.W.3d at 245 (allocation of property in mediated divorce settlement agreement between hu…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); Betts v. Betts, No. 14-11-00267-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 5395 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 10, 2012, pet. denied) (mem. op).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · signal: cf.
Cf. Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 244-45 (Tex.App.-Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See id.; Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); Clanin v. Clanin, 918 S.W.2d 673, 677 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ) (holding that appellant did not timely repudiate his consent to an agreement in a divorce case when he did not object at the final hearing, he did not indicate to the trial court at the final hearing that he was withdrawing his consent, and he first voiced his dissatisfaction with the divorce decree in h…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund , 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund , 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund , 228 S.W.3d 237 , 244 (Tex. App.-Austin 2007, pet. denied) (a husband's intent to abandon his homestead was evidenced by his agreement in an MSA to give the marital home to his wife).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
See In re Marriage of Joyner, 196 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied); Cayan v. Cayan, 38 S.W.3d 161 , 164–66 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied); see also Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.— Austin 2007, pet. denied) (when MSA meets section 6.602’s requirements, it must be enforced in the absence of allegations that the agreement calls for the performance of an illegal act or that it was procured by fraud, dures…
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237 , 240–41 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied) (because enforcement of mediated settlement agreement raised purely legal issues, court used de novo standard of review).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
Id.; see Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 241 (Tex. App.—Austin 1 “The agreement may be revised or repudiated before rendition of the divorce or annulment unless the agreement is binding under another rule of law . . .
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.— Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
See In re Joyner , 196 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, orig. proceeding); Cayan v. Cayan , 38 S.W.3d 161 , 164 - 66 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied); see also Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund , 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied) (noting that when MSA meets section 6.602’s requirements, “it must be enforced in the absence of allegations that the agreement calls for the performance of an illegal act or that it was ‘procured by f…
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied) (where mediated settlement agreement meets section 6.602’s requirements, “it must be enforced in the absence of allegations that the agreement calls for the performance of an illegal act or that it was ‘procured by fraud, duress, coercion, or other dishonest means.’”) (quoting Boyd v. Boyd, 67 S.W.3d 398, 403 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.)); see also Mullins v. Mullins, 202 S.W…
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund , 228 S.W.3d 237, 242 (Tex. App.--Austin 2007, pet. denied) (where mediated settlement agreement meets section 6.602's requirements, "it must be enforced in the absence of allegations that the agreement calls for the performance of an illegal act or that it was 'procured by fraud, duress, coercion, or other dishonest means.'") (quoting Boyd v. Boyd , 67 S.W.3d 398, 403 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2002, no pet.)); see also Mullins v. Mullins , 20…
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
P. 166a; see also Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund, 228 S.W.3d 237, 240 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
P. 166a; see also Spiegel v. KLRU Endowment Fund , 228 S.W.3d 237, 240 (Tex. App.--Austin 2007, pet. denied).