Harris v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services (2007)
green
· 43 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 23 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
J. Stephen Spencer and Kippling L. Spencer v. Noel Douglas Vaughn, Catherine Gay Vaughn and Scott Alan Yeats (2008)
See Lenz v. Lenz , 79 S.W.3d 10, 20 (Tex. 2002); Harris v. Texas Dep't of Family & Protective Servs. , 228 S.W.3d 819, 823 (Tex. App.--Austin 2007, no pet.); Brunson v. Brunson , 502 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Civ.
See Lenz v. Lenz, 79 S.W.3d 10, 20 (Tex. 2002); Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 823 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.); Brunson v. Brunson, 502 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Civ.
See Holley v. Adams , 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex. 1976) (best-interest determination includes current and future emotional and physical dangers to child and parental abilities of those seeking custody); Harris v. Texas Dep't of Family & Protective Servs. , 228 S.W.3d 819, 836 (Tex. App.--Austin 2007, no pet.) (same).
See Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex.1976) (best-interest determination includes current and future emotional and physical dangers to child and parental abilities of those seeking custody); Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 836 (Tex.App.Austin 2007, no pet.) (same).
green
Justin Ryan McCarthy v. State (2009)
See Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex. 1976) (best-interest determination includes current and future emotional and physical dangers to child and parental abilities of those seeking custody); Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 836 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.) (same). 13 Furthermore, Cervantes lived in the same home with Murray and had thus observed him interacting with both children.
See In re A.M.T., 592 S.W.3d 974 , 976 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2019, pet. denied); In re A.D., 480 S.W.3d 643, 645 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015, pet. denied); Harris v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Services, 228 S.W.3d 819, 823 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.); In re C.E.R., 2022 WL 17332598 , at *4; In re L.M.R., 2020 WL 1695505 , at *2.
green
in the Matter of the Marriage of Ephraim Karsagi and Alyssa Lyn Karsagi and in the Interest of E.B.K. and A.Y… (2022)
CODE ANN. § 105.002(c)(1)(A) (“[T]he court may not contravene a jury verdict on . . . the appointment of a sole managing conservator.”); Lenz v. Lenz, 79 S.W.3d 10, 20 (Tex. 2002); Epps v. Deboise, 537 S.W.3d 238, 242 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.); Alexander v. Rogers, 247 S.W.3d 757, 761 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.); Harris v. Tex. Dep’t. of Fam. & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 822 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.); Corrales v. Dep’t. of Fam. & Prot…
green
in the Interest of V.K.H.H., a Child (2022)
“Courts have developed best-interest tests that consider and balance many factors.” Id. (citing Lenz v. Lenz, 79 S.W.3d 10, 19 (Tex. 2002); Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Tex. 1976) (“listing several non-exclusive factors for assessing child’s best interest”); Harris v. Tex. Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.)).
green
Andrew C. Pore v. Cheyenne Ellis (2021)
Holley, 544 S.W.2d at 371-72 (Tex. 1976); Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 836 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.).
green
Andrew C. Pore v. Cheyenne Ellis (2021)
Lenz v. Lenz, 79 S.W.3d 10, 19 (Tex. 2002); See Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Tex. 1976) (listing several non-exclusive factors for assessing child’s best interest); Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.).
III, 423 S.W.3d 486, 492 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014, no pet.) (appellant did not provide affidavit or other offer of proof to show that testimony was material). 5 No. 03-09-00387-CV, 2010 WL 5019411 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 10, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.); Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.).
See, e.g., In re B.C.S., 479 S.W.3d 918 , 927–28 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2015, no pet.); Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 829 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.) (finding best interest of child was served by allowing father to raise him despite paucity of evidence about best interest due in part to denial of visitation).
green
in the Interest of J.J.G., L.K.G., H.A.G., and A.G.G v. Department of Family and Protective Services (2016)
The proper focus . . . is solely upon whether the placement of the child with the natural parent would significantly impair the child’s physical health or emotional development.”); Harris v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 829 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.) 48 (noting child “comfortable” in non-parent home, but “has also been denied contact with his natural parent [for years], and this lack of contact is a result of [DFPS’s] decisions,” not parent…
See 2 These actions include voluntarily leaving the child in another’s possession without providing adequate support for at least six months, knowingly placing or allowing the child to remain in conditions or surroundings or with persons who endangered the child’s emotional or physical well-being, failing to support the child in accordance with their ability for a year ending within six months of the date of the filing of the petition, being the major cause of the child’s fa…
Harris v. Texas Dept. of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 823 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.) (citing City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 807, 821-22 (Tex. 2005)).
Harris v. Texas Dept. of Family & Protective Servs. , 228 S.W.3d 819, 823 (Tex. App.--Austin 2007, no pet.) (citing City of Keller v. Wilson , 168 S.W.3d 802, 807, 821-22 (Tex. 2005)).
green
in Re: D.W., Jr., Z.W., and W.W., Children (2023)
See Harris v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 822-23 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.).
green
in the Interest of B. M., and J. M., Children (2018)
See Harris v. Tex. Dep’t of Family and Protective Svcs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 835 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.).
green
in the Interest of A.E.S., a Child (2018)
See Harris v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 822-23 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.).
green
In re Interest of J.J.G. (2017)
See Harris , 228 S.W.3d at 829 (trial court *90 erred in naming DFPS managing conservator where although child "comfortable" in non-parent home, he "ha[d] also been denied contact with his natural parent [for years], and this lack of contact is a result of [DFPS's] decisions ," not his parent's decisions (emphasis added)).
“Jury findings underlying a conservatorship appointment are subject to ordinary legal and factual sufficiency review.” In re J.A.J., 243 S.W.3d 611 , 617 n.5 (Tex. 2007); see Harris v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819 , 822–23 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.); Corrales v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 155 S.W.3d 478, 488 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2004, no pet.).
green
in the Interest of M.H., S.H., and G.H., Children (2010)
See Harris v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 829-30 (Tex.App.-Austin 2007, no pet.); Hunter, 305 S.W.3d at 206 .
green
In Re Mh (2010)
See Harris v. Tex. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs., 228 S.W.3d 819, 829-30 (Tex.App.-Austin 2007, no pet.); Hunter, 305 S.W.3d at 206 .