City of Portland v. Electric Lightwave, Inc. (2005)
green
· 26 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200620162026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego (2008)
Lightwave, Inc., 452 F.Supp.2d 1049, 1059 (D.Or.2005) ("The Ninth Circuit's interpretation of the scope of section 253(a) appears to depart from the plain meaning of the statute...."); Qwest Corp. v. City of Portland, 200 F.Supp.2d 1250, 1255 (D.Or.2002) (construing the Auburn standard as dictum because reading § 253(a) as preempting regulations that may have the effect of prohibiting telecommunications services "simply misreads the plain wording of the statute"), rev'd by P…
green
Sprint Telephony Pcs v. County of San Diego (2008)
Lightwave, Inc., 452 F. Supp. 2d 1049, 1059 (D.
“The Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of the scope of sec- tion 253(a) appears to depart from the plain meaning of the statute . . . .”
As Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas noted in addressing a similar challenge, “what other benchmark would be used to determine whether a particular provision may have the effect of prohibiting a telecommunications provider from entering the market?” City of Portland v. Electric Lightwave, Inc., 452 F.Supp.2d 1049 , 2005 WL 4044333, *11 (D.Or.
ELI
green
CNSP, Inc. v. City of Santa Fe (2022)
Lightwave, Inc., 452 F. Supp. 2d 1049, 1070-1075 (D.
rejecting argument that city’s franchise fee must be cost-based and concluding fee of 5 percent of provider's gross revenues was competitively neutral, nondiscriminatory, fair, and reasonable