Buxton v. Ullman (1959)

green · 131 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 12

Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

195919922026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Poe v. Ullman (1961)

Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion

The State Court does not agree that there has come into play a "tougher and truer law than the dead words of the written text," and in the light of twelve unsuccessful attempts since 1943 to change this legislation, Poe v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 56 , 156 A. 2d 508, 513, n. 2 , this position is not difficult to understand.

green America's Wholesale Lender v. Pagano (2005)

Quote Authority · Conn. App. Ct. · 4 citations in this opinion

Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 60 , 156 A.2d 508 (1959) (“[t]he privilege of using fictitious names in actions should be granted only in the rare case where the nature of the issue litigated and the interest of the parties demand it and no harm can be done to the public interest”), appeal dismissed sub nom.

“[t]he privilege of using fictitious names in actions should be granted only in the rare case where the nature of the issue litigated and the interest of the parties demand it and no harm can be done to the public interest”

green Doe v. Rostker (1981)

Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.

Id. at 282, citing Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48 , 156 A.2d 508, 514 (1959), appeal dismissed, Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961). .

green Roe v. Borup (1980)

Rule Authority · E.D. Wis.

In Roe v. State of New York, supra, the court noted: “[A] plaintiff who desires to use a name other than his own should, before the case is presented in court, acquaint the court of his desires, . . . and secure the court’s consent.” Roe, supra at p. 282 , citing Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48 , 156 A.2d 508, 514 (1959).

green Roe v. New York (1970)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

In the highest court in Connecticut, it had been said on this point (Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48 , 156 A.2d 508, 514 (1959)): “Because of the intimate and distressing details alleged in these complaints, it is understandable that the parties who are allegedly medical patients would wish to be anonymous.

green State v. Darwin (1964)

Rule Authority · Conn. Super. Ct.

Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 54 (1959).

green Seletsky v. Roy (1961)

Rule Authority · pactcompl

Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 56 (1959).

green Dunn v. Ives (1961)

Rule Authority · pactcompl

Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 56 (1959); State ex rel.

green Cagianello v. Letare (1961)

Rule Authority · pactcompl

Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 56 (1959); State ex rel.

green London v. Zoning Board of Bridgeport (1961)

Rule Authority · pactcompl

Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 56 (1959); Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156 (1959); Hurlbutt v. Hatheway, 139 Conn. 258, 262 (1952).

green Romanowski v. Foley (1987)

Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48 , 156 A.2d 508 (1959), appeal dismissed, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S. Ct. 1752 , 6 L.

green Doe v. Maher (1986)

Cited · Conn. Super. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 50 , 156 A.2d 508 (1959), appeal dismissed, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S. Ct. 1752 , 6 L.