Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Marsh (1983)
green
· 6 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Marsh (1987)
In a decision since vacated to accommodate changing facts, the district court held that the Gateway Act did not prohibit the proposed transfer to the Navy and that Interior was required to accept the excess land at Fort Wadsworth tendered by the Department of the Army. 568 F.Supp. 1387, 1391-94 (E.D.N.Y.1983).
green
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Marsh (1987)
NRDC argued that, once the Army no longer needed Fort Wadsworth land to support Army uses existing in 1972, the Gateway Act required the Army to transfer the land to the Secretary of the Interior for inclusion in the recreation area. 5 In a decision since vacated to accommodate changing facts, the district court held that the Gateway Act did not prohibit the proposed transfer to the Navy and that Interior was required to accept the excess land at Fort Wadsworth tendered by t…