How cited: Graf v. Bacon · Go Syfert

Graf v. Bacon (1990)

green · 26 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 9
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Lay v. Lay (1995)
Rule Authority · Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion
Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990).
green Hatch v. Hooten (1993)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990), teaches that even though vagueness in an underlying dissolution or modification decree may prevent its enforcement, many such judgments have enough force to be the basis for a new order correcting the deficiency of the underlying modified decree.
green Liberty v. Liberty (1992)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Echele, 782 S.W.2d at 436 ; Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990).
green DeCapo v. DeCapo (1996)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990).
green Jones v. Jones (1995)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990).
green Adelman v. Adelman (1994)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
In re Marriage of Luna, 855 S.W.2d 488, 485 (Mo.App.S.D.1993) and Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990).
green Stelzer v. Stelzer (1994)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
See, In re Marriage of Hatch, 851 S.W.2d 103, 108 [3] (Mo.App.1993) (where uncertainty exists as to the nature of the obligation to pay college expenses, correction upon motion to modify must precede enforcement); Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 [4] (Mo.App.1990) (deficiency of the original order may be corrected upon motion to modify).
green Gable v. Gable (1991)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990).
green Gordon v. Gordon (1996)
Cited (see also) · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Graf v. Bacon, 800 S.W.2d 88, 90 (Mo.App.1990) ("It is no valid objection to the child support provisions of a dissolution decree that it may 'require payments by the supporting parent to third parties such as schools, camps, or health care providers’ "). 7 .