How cited: Swilley v. Hughes · Go Syfert

Swilley v. Hughes (1972)

green · 930 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197219992026
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 121 S.W.3d 811, 817 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2003, pet. denied) ....................... 29 Stephens v. LPP Mortg., 316 S.W.3d 742, 747 (Tex. App.-Austin 2010, pet. denied) ............................... 42 Swiley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972) ............................................................................ 30 Tenery v. Tenery, 932 S.W.2d 30 (Tex. 1996) ...................................................................... 11, 17, 18 Terra XXI, Ltd. v.…
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Dist.] 1980m writ ref’d n.r.e.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 6 Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64 68 (Tex. 2002) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 10, 16 Texas A & M Univ. v. Chambers, 31 S.W.3d 780, 784-85 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000, pet. denied) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ………………………………..4 Tex. City Clearview Care Ct…
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972); Ortega-Carter v. Am.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Inv., Inc., 998 F.2d 324 , 327 (5 th Cir. 1993)(focusing on the “economic reality” and considering the degree of control exercised by the club, the extent of the relative investments, the degree to which the dancer’s opportunity for profit or loss was determined by the club, the skill and initiative required in performing the job, and the permanency of the relationship). 20 … Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); see also Great Am.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Inv., Inc., 998 F.2d 324 , 327 (5 th Cir. 1993)(focusing on the “economic reality” and considering the degree of control exercised by the club, the extent of the relative investments, the degree to which the dancer’s opportunity for profit or loss was determined by the club, the skill and initiative required in performing the job, and the permanency of the relationship). 20: Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); see also Great Am.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Standard of Review “Rule 166a provides a method of summarily terminating a case when it clearly appears that only a question of law is involved and that there is no genuine fact issue.” Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. Steel, 997 S.W.2d 217, 222 (Tex. 1999) (citing Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tex. 1972)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Frost Nat’l Bank v. Fernandez, 315 S.W.3d 494 , 508–09 (Tex. 2010); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Area Metro.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Eagle Oil & Gas Co. v. TRO-X, L.P., 619 S.W.3d 699 , 705 (Tex. 2021); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Oil Co. of Tex., 513 S.W.2d 533, 534 (Tex. 1974) (per curiam); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tex. 1972)); see also Amedisys, Inc., 437 S.W.3d at 511-12 (“This is because ‘summary judgments must stand or fall on their own merits, and the non-movant’s failure to answer or respond cannot supply by default the summary judgment proof necessary to establish the movant’s right’ to judgment.”) (citing McConnell, 858 S.W.2d at 343 (citing Clear Creek Basin Auth., 589 S.W.2d a…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
But “[i]n our summary judgment practice, the opponent’s silence never improves the quality of a movant’s evidence.” Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Quote Authority · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972) (“In our summary judgment practice, the opponent’s silence never improves the quality of the movant’s evidence.”).
“In our summary judgment practice, the opponent’s silence never improves the quality of the movant’s evidence.”
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Friesenhahn, 960 S.W.2d at 658 (citing Tex. Dep’t of Corrections v. Herring, 513 S.W.2d 6, 10 (Tex. 1974); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Auth., 589 S.W.2d 671 , 678 n. 5 (Tex.1979); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Nixon, 690 S.W.2d at 548 ; Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
A. Standard of Review and Applicable Law “Rule 166a provides a method of summarily terminating a case when it clearly appears that only a question of law is involved and that there is no genuine fact issue.” Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. Steel, 997 S.W.2d 217, 222 (Tex. 1999) (citing Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tex. 1972)); see also TEX.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972); Ortega v. City Nat’l Bank, 97 S.W.3d 765, 772 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swil- against The Michael Group assert that The ley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 2.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Killam Ranch Props., Ltd. v. Webb Cnty., 376 S.W.3d 146, 158 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2012, pet. denied) (citing Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972)). “[W]hile the factual determination of what *574 actions were taken is for the fact finder, whether those actions constitute a breach of contract is a question of law for the court.” Benavides v. Benavides, No. 04-11-00252-CV, 2011 WL 5407493 , at *1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio Nov. 9, 2011, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (citing I…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); 4 see also Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Ortega v. City Nat’l Bank, 97 S.W.3d 765, 772 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
STANDARD OF REVIEW “Rule 166a provides a method of summarily terminating a case when it clearly appears that only a question of law is involved and that there is no genuine fact issue.” Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. Steel, 997 S.W.2d 217, 222 (Tex. 1999) (citing Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tex. 1972)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Friesenhahn, 960 S.W.2d at 658 ; Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Heil Co. v. Polar Corp., 191 S.W.3d 805, 817 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); see also Baylor Univ. v. Sonnichsen, 221 S.W.3d 632, 635, 637 (Tex. 2007) (per curiam).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Friesenhahn, 960 S.W.2d at 658 ; Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Heil Co. v. Polar Corp., 191 S.W.3d 805, 817 (Tex.App. -- Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); see also Baylor Univ. v. Sonnichsen, 221 S.W.3d 632, 635, 637 (Tex. 2007) (per curiam).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Smiley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Ortega-Carter v. Am.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Havlen v. McDougall , 22 S.W.3d 343, 345 (Tex. 2000); Swilley v. Hughes , 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Poncar v. Mission , 797 S.W.2d 236, 239 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1990, no writ). 2.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In support of her argument, Obregon pointed to the Agreement, which set forth the two-part consideration required to purchase the Evergreen property, and evidence in the record establishing that Ten-Booms did not 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Poncar v. Mission, 797 S.W.2d 236, 239 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ). 2 It is a general rule in Texas that a party must show that he has complied with his obligations under the contract to be entitled to specific performance.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes , 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972); Ortega-Carter v. Am.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. *853 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Ryland Group , 924 S.W.2d at 121 ; Swilley v. Hughes , 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Ryland Group, 924 S.W.2d at 121 ; Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. , 690 S.W.2d 546, 548 (Tex. 1985); Swilley v. Hughes , 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972); Jorden, 20 S.W.3d at 849 .
green Dowell v. Dowell (2008)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
MMP, Ltd. v. Jones, 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex.1986); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
MMP, Ltd. v. Jones , 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1986); Swilley v. Hughes , 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Smiley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 166a(c); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
MMP, Ltd. v. Jones , 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1986); Brazos Valley Cmty. Action Agency v. Robison , 900 S.W.2d 843, 845 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1995, no writ) (citing Swilley v. Hughes , 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex. 1972)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
The function of summary judgment is not to deprive litigants of the right to trial by jury, but to eliminate "patently unmeritorious claims or untenable defenses." Swilley v. Hughes , 488 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tex. 1972).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972). 9 .