How cited: Singleton v. Roman · Go Syfert

Singleton v. Roman (1950)

green · 66 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195719912026
green Dempsey v. State (1974)
Rule Authority · Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
The court must not assume the power of judging the credibility of witnesses or determining the weight of testimony in case of discrepancy.” Singleton v. Roman, 195 Md. 241, 246 , 72 A. 2d 705, 707 (1950). “ ‘It is undoubtedly true that a trial judge, because of his high and authoritative position, should be exceedingly careful in any remarks made by him during the progress of a trial, either in passing upon evidence or ruling upon prayers, and should carefully refrain, eithe…
green Kempe v. Dometic Corp. (1994)
Rule Authority · D. Del. · 2 citations in this opinion
Singleton v. Roman, 195 Md. 241 , 72 A.2d 705, 707 (1950); Tereshuk v. State, 66 Md.App. 193 , 503 A.2d 254, 256 , cert. denied, 306 *820 Md. 119, 507 A.2d 631 (1986).
green State v. Elzey (2021)
Quote Authority · Md. · signal: see
See Singleton v. Roman, 195 Md. 241, 247 (1950) (“[A]n instruction is erroneous if it withdraws from the consideration of the jury any evidence, however weak, tending to establish material facts.”); Bentley v. Carroll, 355 Md. 312, 331 (1999) (“To the extent that the court’s instruction rendered all non-expert evidence irrelevant to the issue of causation, the jury was misguided in its task, and the court erred.”); Kennelly v. Burgess, 337 Md. 562, 574 (1995) (holding an ins…
“[A]n instruction is erroneous if it withdraws from the consideration of the jury any evidence, however weak, tending to establish material facts.”
Rule Authority · Md.
Laws, ch. 158, have expressly held that “a very slight odor of alcohol on the driver’s breath,” with no other sign of intoxication, sufficed to raise a jury question “whether [the motorist] was actually under the influence of intoxicating liquor in any degree[.]” Singleton v. Roman, 195 Md. 241, 247 , 72 A.2d 705, 707 (1950).
green Briskie v. Santangelo (1988)
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See Singleton v. Roman, 72 A.2d 705, 707 (Md.1950). 5 Especially in a case such as this, where the testimony is in total conflict, it is critical to leave to the jury the discretion to sort out the facts.
green State v. Martin (1993)
Cited · Md. · signal: accord · 4 citations in this opinion
Accord Singleton v. Roman, 195 Md. 241 , 72 A.2d 705 (1950) (refusal to give an instruction that is applicable to the issues, when it is not covered by other instructions, is a ground for reversal).
refusal to give an instruction that is applicable to the issues, when it is not covered by other instructions, is a ground for reversal
green Bentley v. Carroll (1999)
Cited · Md. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Singleton v. Roman, 195 Md. 241, 247 , 72 A.2d 705, 707 (1950) (“[A]n instruction is erroneous if it withdraws from the consideration of the jury any evidence, however weak, tending to establish material facts.” (citation omitted)).
“[A]n instruction is erroneous if it withdraws from the consideration of the jury any evidence, however weak, tending to establish material facts.” (citation omitted)
green Carter v. Correa (1975)
Cited (see also) · Md. Ct. Spec. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Singleton v. Roman, 195 Md. 241 , 72 A. 2d 705 (1950).