State v. Bethel (2010)
green
· 18 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Reyes v. the State (2015)
State v. Bethel, 307 Ga. App. 508, 509 ( 705 SE2d 860 ) (2010).
green
Williams v. the State (2014)
“Where... the issue turns on the question of whether a trial court committed an error of law in granting a motion to suppress, we apply a de novo standard of review. [Cit.]” State v. Bethel, 307 Ga. App. 508, 509 ( 705 SE2d 860 ) (2010).
green
State v. Marissa Nicole Gauthier (2014)
We agree. [T]he trial court’s findings as to disputed facts in a ruling on a motion to suppress will be reviewed to determine whether the ruling was clearly erroneous; where the evidence is uncontroverted and no question regarding the credibility of witnesses is presented, the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo appellate review.3 “Where, as here, the issue turns on the question of whether a trial court committed an error of law in …
green
State v. Meagan Leigh Vaughn (2014)
“Where . . . the issue turns on the question of whether a trial court committed an error of law in granting a motion to suppress, we apply a de novo standard of review. [Cit.]” State v. Bethel, 307 Ga. App. 508, 509 ( 705 SE2d 860 ) (2010).
green
State v. Vaughn (2014)
“Where... the issue turns on the question of whether a trial court committed an error of law in granting a motion to suppress, we apply a de novo standard of review. [Cit.]” State v. Bethel, 307 Ga. App. 508, 509 ( 705 SE2d 860 ) (2010).