How cited: Runnells v. Firestone · Go Syfert

Runnells v. Firestone (1988)

green · 359 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 5 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat'l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. (citing Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988)); Robles, 965 S.W.2d at 615 .
Quote Authority · Tex. · 2 citations in this opinion
Bank in Ctr., Tex., 760 S.W.2d 240, 241 (Tex. 1988) (“In December of 1981, Sherman received a letter from the Bank demanding the payment of several notes, including the $75,000 real estate note which was not due and owing at that time.”); Inwood N. Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc. v. Harris, 736 S.W.2d 632, 641 (Tex. 1987) (“The developer, or the association, is a general creditor who . . . must stand in line along with [other creditors] for payment of sums due and owing.”). 9 The Co…
“In December of 1981, Sherman received a letter from the Bank demanding the payment of several notes, including the $75,000 real estate note which was not due and owing at that time.”
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988) (per curiam) (citing Alm v. Aluminum Co. of Am., 717 S.W.2d 588, 593 (Tex.1986)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat ' l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988) (per curiam) (citing Alm v. Aluminum Co. of Am. , 717 S.W.2d 588, 593 (Tex. 1986)).
per curiam
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988); In re King’s Estate, 150 Tex. 662 , 244 S.W.2d 660, 661 (1951).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988); In re King’s Estate, 150 Tex. 662 , 244 S.W.2d 660, 661 (1951).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); In Re King’s Estate, 150 Tex. 662 , 244 S.W.2d 660, 661 (Tex. 1951).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bank in Ctr., Tex., 760 S.W.2d 240, 241 (Tex.1988) (“In December of 1981, Sherman received a letter from the Bank demanding the payment of several notes, including the $75,000 real estate note which was not due and owing at that time.”); Inwood N. Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc. v. Harris, 736 S.W.2d 632, 641 (Tex.1987) (“The developer, or the association, is a general creditor who ... must stand in line along with [other creditors] for payment of sums due and owing.”).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Nat'l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); In re King's Estate, 150 Tex. 662 , 244 S.W.2d 660, 661 (Tex. (Emphasis added.) Appellant contends that the affi- 1951).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); Raymond , 190 S.W.3d at 80 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Mauricio v. Castro, 287 S.W.3d 476, 478 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.); Home & Hearth Sugarland, 215 S.W.3d at 516 (citing Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Tex., 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Mauricio v. Castro, 287 S.W.3d 476, 478 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2009, no pet.); Home & Hearth Sugarland, 215 S.W.3d at 516 (citing Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Tex., 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat'l Bank in Center, Texas, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); Linan, 155 S.W.3d at 302 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat'l Bank in Center, Texas , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); Linan , 155 S.W.3d at 302 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Texas, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); Linan, 155 S.W.3d at 302 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Texas, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988); Linan, 155 S.W.3d at 302 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Tex., 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
green Lee v. Hersey (2006)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); Robles , 965 S.W.2d at 615 .
green Raymond v. Raymond (2005)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988); Robles, 965 S.W.2d at 615 .
green Cullins v. Foster (2005)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Natl Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat = l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat ’ l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 241-42 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 241-42 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 241-42 (Tex. 1988).
green Linan v. Rosales (2004)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Texas, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); Heafner , 12 S.W.3d at 109 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988); Heafner, 12 S.W.3d at 109 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988); Heafner, 12 S.W.3d at 109 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); Heafner , 12 S.W.3d at 109 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Mauricio v. Castro , 287 S.W.3d 476, 478 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.); Home & Hearth Sugarland , 215 S.W.3d at 516 (citing Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Tex. , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bank in Center , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988) (per curiam) (holding that finding of fact must be upheld when it is supported by more than a scintilla of evidence and appellate court may not consider contradictory evidence contained in the record).
per curiam
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. v. Nishika Ltd. , 953 S.W.2d 733, 738 (Tex. 1997); Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat'l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988) (legal sufficiency: examining the record for evidence that tends to support the finding, while disregarding all evidence and inferences to the contrary); Cain v. Bain , 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986) (factual sufficiency: determining, in light of the entire record, whether the finding is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust).
legal sufficiency: examining the record for evidence that tends to support the finding, while disregarding all evidence and inferences to the contrary
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988); In re King’s Estate , 150 Tex. 662 , 244 S.W.2d 660, 661 (1951).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat'l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat'l Bank , 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex. 1988).
green Mars, Inc. v. Gonzalez (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988); Marshall Field, 859 S.W.2d at 396 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat'l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank in Center, Tex., 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
green Clay v. BMS, Inc. (2001)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988).
green Harris County v. Smith (2001)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Sherman v. First Nat’l Bank, 760 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1988) (legal sufficiency: examining the record for evidence that tends to support the finding, while disregarding all evidence and inferences to the contrary); Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex.1986) (factual sufficiency: determining, in light of the entire record, whether the finding is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust).