Jones v. Quintana (2009)

Cir. 1996) (“a section 1983 complaint alleging municipal liability must include some factual basis for the allegation of a municipal policy or custom”); Jones v. Quintana, 658 F. Supp. 2d 183, 197 (D.D.C. 2009).

For that reason, “district courts in this Circuit routinely dismiss [§ 1983] claims brought against District officials in their official capacities where such claims are duplicative of claims brought against the District itself.” Jones v. Quintana, 658 F. Supp. 2d 183, 195 (D.D.C. 2009).

Jones v. Quintana, 658 F. Supp. 2d 183, 197 (D.D.C. 2009); see also DuBerry v. District of Columbia, 582 F. Supp. 2d 27, 39 (D.D.C. 2008) (finding insufficient evidence of a widespread custom, practice, or policy where the plaintiff failed to “produce[] any evidence that the Department’s alleged discriminatory employment practices impacted a single employee or prospective employee other than himself”).

See Atchinson v. *38 District of Columbia, 73 F.3d 418, 422 (D.C.Cir.1996) (“a section 1983 complaint alleging municipal liability must include some factual basis for the allegation of a municipal policy or custom”); Jones v. Quintana, 658 F.Supp.2d 183, 197 (D.D.C. 2009).

See Jonesy 658 F.Supp.2d at 204 .

See Jones v. Quintana, 658 F.Supp.2d 183 (D.D.C.2009).

See Jones v. Quintana, 658 F. Supp. 2d 183, 195 (D.D.C. 2009). 2 Plaintiff’s complaint includes two paragraphs numbered “30.” Dkt. 16 at 8 (Am.

See generally Jones, 658 F.Supp.2d 183 .

See 658 F.Supp.2d 183 (D.D.C.2009).