How cited: Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Jones · Go Syfert

Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Jones (1991)

green · 36 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 17 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
Rule Authority · Ky. · 2 citations in this opinion
Com'n v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991)); KRS 446.080(4).
Rule Authority · Ky. · 2 citations in this opinion
Com’n v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991) (“The courts have a duty to accord statutory language its literal meaning unless to do so would lead to an absurd or wholly unreasonable result.”).
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Com'n v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991).
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
“When there is no specific statutory definition, words of a statute shall be construed according to their common and approved usage.” Revenue Cabinet v. Comcast, supra, quoting Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991).
Quote Authority · Ky. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Jones, Ky.App., 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (1991) ("When there is no specific statutory definition, words of a statute shall be construed according to their common and approved usage."). [4] Majority Opinion, 86 S.W.3d 47, 50 (2002) ("After considering... the plain meaning of the words ...."). [5] AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE (4th ed.2000) (emphasis added). [6] WEBSTER'S REVISED UNABRIDGED DICTIONARY (1988). [7] BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY (7th ed.1999) (e…
"When there is no specific statutory definition, words of a statute shall be construed according to their common and approved usage."
green McElroy v. Taylor (1998)
Rule Authority · Ky. · 2 citations in this opinion
Comm’n v. Jones, Ky.App., 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (1991).
Quote Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Co. v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky. App. 1991) (“In addition, the courts have a duty to accord statutory language its literal meaning unless to do so would lead to an absurd or a wholly unreasonable result.”).
“In addition, the courts have a duty to accord statutory language its literal meaning unless to do so would lead to an absurd or a wholly unreasonable result.”
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Dr. Ebbs argues that the Commission may not substitute its judgment for that of the employer with regard to determining instances of misconduct.7 However, our Court has already determined that the Commission is at liberty to 6 676 S.W.2d 472 (Ky. 1984). 7 According to Dr. Ebbs, the Commission is required to narrowly interpret an employer’s stated reason for firing an employee under Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky. App. 1991).
Rule Authority · Ky.
Co. v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky. App. 1991) (citing Claude N. Fannin Wholesale Co. v. Thacker, 661S.W.2d477 (Ky. App. 1983)).
citing Claude N. Fannin Wholesale Co. v. Thacker, 661S.W.2d477 (Ky. App. 1983)
Rule Authority · Ky.
Co. v: Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky. App. 1991) (citing Claude N. Fannin Wholesale Co. v. Thacker, 661S.W.2d477 (Ky. App. 1983)). / 13 Commonwealth v. Plowman, 86 S.W.3d 47, 49 (Ky. 2002). 14 (emphasis added). 1s 594 S.W.2d 884 (Ky. App. 1979). 16 McKinney, 594 S.W.2d at 887 . 7 less tha.n two grams.
citing Claude N. Fannin Wholesale Co. v. Thacker, 661S.W.2d477 (Ky. App. 1983)
green Commonwealth v. Rhodes (2010)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Com’n v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991)).
Rule Authority · Ky.
Com’n v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991)); KRS 446.080(4).
green Hill v. Thompson (2009)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Comm’n v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991).
green Richardson v. Rees (2009)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Comm’n v. Jones, 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Ky.App.1991).
green Pate v. Commonwealth (2004)
Rule Authority · Ky.
Co. v. Jones, Ky.App., 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (1991) ("When there is no specific statutory definition, words of a statute shall be construed according to their common and approved usage.”); KRS 446.080(4). 19 .
"When there is no specific statutory definition, words of a statute shall be construed according to their common and approved usage.”
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Comm’n. v. Jones, Ky.App., 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (1991).
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Comm’n v. Jones, Ky.App., 809 S.W.2d 715, 716 (1991), citing Claude N. Fannin Wholesale Co. v. Thacker, Ky.App., 661 S.W.2d 477 (1983).