How cited: Arnold v. State · Go Syfert

Arnold v. State (1993)

green · 42 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The court has also held, however, that “if the State unnecessarily alleges ownership of the property, the State assumes the burden of proving that allegation.” Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex. Crim.
green Thompson v. State (2000)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). [2] "[I]f a trial court sustains an objection to improper jury argument, the complaining party must request an instruction to disregard to preserve error on appeal if an instruction to disregard could have cured the prejudice resulting from the argument. [citation omitted].
green Young v. State (1998)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The same language was expressly rejected in Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Crim.
green Sparkman v. State (1997)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Cr.App.1993).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993) (en banc); Langston v. State, 855 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993); see generally Thompson v. State, 12 S.W.3d 915, 920 (Tex.App.–Beaumont 2000, pet. ref’d) (holding the State need not prove ownership where it pleads the defendant remained on “property of another” rather than explicit ownership in a particular person). (footnote: 3) Gill testified the “old skid road” used by appellant was not open to the public.
en banc
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993) (en banc); Langston v. State, 855 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993); see generally Thompson v. State, 12 S.W.3d 915, 920 (Tex.App.–Beaumont 2000, pet. ref’d) (holding the State need not prove ownership where it pleads the defendant remained on “property of another” rather than explicit ownership in a particular person). (footnote: 3) Gill testified the “old skid road” used by appellant was not open to the public.
en banc
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993) (en banc); Langston v. State, 855 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993); see generally Thompson v. State, 12 S.W.3d 915, 920 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2000, pet. ref'd) (holding the State need not prove ownership where it pleads the defendant remained on "property of another" rather than explicit ownership in a particular person). (3) Gill testified the "old skid road" used by appellant was not open to the public.
en banc
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993) (en banc); Langston v. State, 855 S.W.2d 718 , 721 2 Notice may be by oral or written communication, fencing or other enclosure designed to exclude intruders, posted signs, or placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts.
en banc
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Arnold v. State , 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex. Crim.
green Crunk v. State (1996)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Palmer v. State, 764 S.W.2d 332, 334 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, no pet.) (noting that joint ownership is a defense to criminal trespass); Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Crim.App.1993) (noting that trespass statute requires only that defendant enter and remain on property of another) (emphasis in original).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Arnold v. State , 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex. Crim.
green State v. Mendieta (1995)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
However, the defendant can rebut the State’s case by showing that he also has a possessory interest in that property and thus is not trespassing on the land of “another.” Arnold v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Crim.App.1993); Langston, 855 S.W.2d at 721 ; Palmer v. State, 764 S.W.2d 332, 334 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, no pet.).
green Michael Bader v. State (2000)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See 867 S.W.2d at 378 .
green Bader v. State (2000)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See 867 S.W.2d at 378 .
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
App. 1993); see also Arnold v. State , 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex. Crim.
trespass at courthouse
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
App. 1993); see also Arnold v. State , 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex. Crim.
trespass at courthouse
green Anthony v. State (2006)
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
Langston v. State, 855 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993); see also Arnold, v. State, 867 S.W.2d 378, 379 (Tex.Crim.App.1993) (trespass at courthouse).