How cited: Nabisco, Inc. v. Rylander · Go Syfert

Nabisco, Inc. v. Rylander (1999)

green · 16 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 9
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Public Utility Commission of Texas (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Nabisco v. Rylander, 992 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex. App.CAustin 1999, pet. denied) (citing Stanford v. Butler, 181 S.W.2d 269, 273 (Tex. 1944); ADP Credit Corp. v. Sharp, 921 S.W.2d 490, 493 (Tex. App.CAustin 1996, writ denied)).
green Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Public Utility Commission of Texas (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Nabisco v. Rylander , 992 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex. App.--Austin 1999, pet. denied) (citing Stanford v. Butler , 181 S.W.2d 269, 273 (Tex. 1944); ADP Credit Corp. v. Sharp , 921 S.W.2d 490, 493 (Tex. App.--Austin 1996, writ denied)).
green Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Nabisco v. Rylander, 992 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.App. — Austin 1999, pet. denied) (citing Stanford v. Butler, 142 Tex. 692 , 181 S.W.2d 269, 273 (1944); ADP Credit Corp. v. Sharp, 921 S.W.2d 490, 493 (Tex.App. — Austin 1996, writ denied)).
green DaimlerChrysler Corporation v. James E. Williams and Vicki Williams And Texas Motor Vehicle Board of the Texa… (2000)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Nabisco, Inc. v. Rylander , 992 S.W.2d 678, 681-82 (Tex. App.--Austin 1999, pet. denied).
green Berry Contracting, L.P. v. Texas Workforce Commission (2004)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Nabisco, Inc. v. Rylander, 992 S.W.2d 678, 681-82 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. denied).
green Berry Contracting, L.P. v. Texas Workforce Commission (2004)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Nabisco, Inc. v. Rylander , 992 S.W.2d 678, 681-82 (Tex. App.--Austin 1999, pet. denied).
green GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission (2003)
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
Id. at 228 ; see also Nabisco v. Rylander, 992 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, pet. denied); Texas Citrus Exch. v. Sharp, 955 S.W.2d 164, 168 (Tex.App.-Austin 1997, no pet.).
green GTE Southwest, Incorporated D/B/A Verizon Southwest/MCI Communications Corporation and MCI WorldCom Communica… (2003)
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
Id . at 228; see also Nabisco v. Rylander , 992 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex. App.--Austin 1999, pet. denied); Texas Citrus Exch. v. Sharp , 955 S.W.2d 164, 168 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, no pet.).
green GTE Southwest, Incorporated D/B/A Verizon Southwest/MCI Communications Corporation and MCI WorldCom Communica… (2003)
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
Id. at 228 ; see also Nabisco v. Rylander, 992 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex. App.CAustin 1999, pet. denied); Texas Citrus Exch. v. Sharp, 955 S.W.2d 164, 168 (Tex. App.CAustin 1997, no pet.). 8 The Commission=s explanation for its jurisdiction in Docket No. 21088 is instructive.