Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Drexel Chemical Co. (2009)
green
· 14 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Dantzler v. United States Department of Justice (2021)
Accord Syngenta, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 62 (“Because Syngenta has not established subject matter jurisdiction independent of . . . the All Writs Act, it cannot independently assert subject matter jurisdiction under [it].”). * * * If Dantzler’s petition can be construed as raising other claims against the NAACP Defendants, none would survive dismissal.
“Because Syngenta has not established subject matter jurisdiction independent of . . . the All Writs Act, it cannot independently assert subject matter jurisdiction under [it].”
green
Nikol Snezana Gerou and Kenneth Roy Gerou v. Virginia George, Titania Whitten and United States (2025)
Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 54, 62 (D.D.C. 2009); Dist. 2, Marine Eng’rs Beneficial Ass’n, Associated Mar.
green
Herr v. Ludwig (2025)
Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 54, 62 (D.D.C. 2009); Dist. 2, Marine Eng’rs Beneficial Ass’n, Associated Mar.
green
Hunter v. Haas (2025)
Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 54, 62 (D.D.C. 2009) (holding that a federal district court does not have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 to order a private entity to perform a duty or to act); Carman v. Richardson, 357 F. Supp. 1148, 1157 (D.
holding that a federal district court does not have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 to order a private entity to perform a duty or to act
green
Abadi v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (2024)
Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 54, 61 (D.D.C. 2009) (“The Constitution is not offended when parties are willing to arbitrate . . . .”).
“The Constitution is not offended when parties are willing to arbitrate . . . .”
See, e.g., González-Vera v. Townley, 83 F. Supp. 3d 306, 314 (D.D.C. 2015) (private debtor); Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc., 655 F. Supp. 2d at 62 (business competitor and arbitration panel); Dantzler v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., Civ.
business competitor and arbitration panel
green
Arunachalam v. Harris (2021)
Pa. Nov. 14, 2013) (finding that mandamus relief under § 1361 cannot be obtained against utility companies and their employees); Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Drexel Chemical Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 54, 62 (D.D.C. 2009) (concluding that 28 U.S.C. § 1361 does not confer subject matter jurisdiction in case where plaintiff sought to compel private, not federal, entities to act).
concluding that 28 U.S.C. § 1361 does not confer subject matter jurisdiction in case where plaintiff sought to compel private, not federal, entities to act
green
Sheldon v. James E. Rogers Law School (2014)
Pa. Nov. l4, 2013) (finding that mandamus relief under § 1361 carmot be obtained against utility companies and their employees)', Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Drexel Chemical Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 54, 62 (D.D.C. 2009) (concluding that 28 U.S.C. § 1361 , does not confer subject matter jurisdiction in case where plaintiff sought to compel private, not federal, entities to act).
concluding that 28 U.S.C. § 1361 , does not confer subject matter jurisdiction in case where plaintiff sought to compel private, not federal, entities to act
Co., No. 08-1627, 2009 WL 2584767, *5 (D.D.C.
green
Manning v. Barr (2021)
See Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Drexel Chemical Co., 655 F. Supp. 2d 54, 62 (D.D.C. 2009).5 B.