Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co. v. Angoff (1995)

green · 119 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199620112026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Randall Graves v. Missouri Department of Corrections, the Division of Probation and Parole (2021)

Rule Authority · Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Goerlitz v. City of Maryville (2011)

Quote Authority · Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo. banc 1995) (“An injunction is an extraordinary and harsh remedy and should not be employed where there is an adequate remedy at law.”).

“An injunction is an extraordinary and harsh remedy and should not be employed where there is an adequate remedy at law.”

green Weinschenk v. State (2006)

Rule Authority · Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995).

green American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Nigl (2003)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995) (declaratory judgment is not available to adjudicate hypothetical or speculative situations which may never come to pass); McHaffie by & Through Wieland v. Bunch, 951 S.W.2d 340, 342 (Mo.App.

declaratory judgment is not available to adjudicate hypothetical or speculative situations which may never come to pass

green Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water Commission (2003)

Rule Authority · Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion

Farm Bureau Town and Country Insurance Company of Missouri, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995); State ex rel Nixon v. American Tobacco Company, Inc., 34 S.W.3d 122, 128 (Mo. banc 2000); see also Local Union 1287 v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, 848 S.W.2d 462, 464 (Mo. banc 1993)(noting reasons courts decline to render hypothetical judgments and opinion).

green Louis Jones, et al. vs. Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, et al. (2025)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995).

green David Barrett v. Cole County, Missouri (2024)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region v. Robert Knodell, in his official capacity as Acting Director of … (2024)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Maui Lani Neighbors v. State (2023)

Rule Authority · Haw. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352-53 (Mo. 1995) (en banc) (holding that constitutional claims, that statutes violated due process for vagueness and also appropriated property without due process, could be preserved and raised during judicial review of administrative proceeding, and plaintiff was required to exhaust administrative remedies); 2 Am.

en banc

green Ronald D. Ruff v. Bequette Construction, Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995)) (“Declaratory judgment actions should not be resorted to for the purpose of giving advisory opinions.”); see also Ruff, 662 S.W.3d at 90.

green City of Foley v. Director, Missouri Department of Revenue and Missouri State Auditor Nicole Galloway (2022)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Jeschke AG Service, LLC v. Daniel S. Bell (2022)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995)).

green Odi Frumhoff Schultz v. Bank of America Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation (2022)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995)).

green Randall Graves v. Missouri Department of Corrections, The Division of Probation and Parole (2020)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Additionally, 14 CSR 80-5.020(1)(H) provides that when "an offender is unable to pay because of having insufficient income, fees may be waived in whole or in part." In Farm Bureau Town and Country Insurance Company of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995), the Court found that: Until an agency has made a final determination that finds facts, applies the law to those facts, and construes the applicable statutes, it is impossible to know if a subsisting justi…

green Church v. Missouri (2017)

Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.

Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo. banc 1995); Foster v. State, 352 S.W.3d 357, 359 (Mo. banc 2011).

green Gwyn v. Summers (2017)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Covert v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Family Support Division (2017)

Quote Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995) (“If administrative remedies are adequate, they must be exhausted before declaratory relief may be granted.”); Britz v. Reynolds, 895 S.W.2d 645, 648 (Mo. App. W.D. 1995) (“[Wjhere the statute provides the remedy and the procedure to be followed, such procedure must be complied with; [and] that a failure to comply with the statute is jurisdictional”).

“If administrative remedies are adequate, they must be exhausted before declaratory relief may be granted.”

green Israel Ivan Ramirez v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Children's Division (2016)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo.banc 1995).

green Lester M. Dean, Jr. v. Richard W. Noble (2015)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents. (2015)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Airport Tech Partners, LLP, and Stentor Company, LLP v. State of Missouri and City of Kansas City, Missouri (2015)

Quote Authority · Mo.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 858 (Mo, banc 1995) (“Declaratory judgment actions should not be resorted to for the purpose of giving advisory opinions”).

“Declaratory judgment actions should not be resorted to for the purpose of giving advisory opinions”

green Strack Excavating, LLC v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Land Reclamation Commission Saxony Luther… (2015)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995) (stating that a “declaratory judgment is not available to adjudicate hypothetical or speculative situations which may never come to pass”).

stating that a “declaratory judgment is not available to adjudicate hypothetical or speculative situations which may never come to pass”

green Damon Thomas v. Larry Denney (2014)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. Wilburn (2013)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Foster v. State (2011)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Missouri Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. State Board of Registration (2011)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo. banc 1995); See also Group Health Plan, 787 S.W.2d at 749 (Mo.App.1990) (holding that exhaustion of remedies was not required when plaintiffs were threatened by an agency with application of a statute).

green Coleman v. Missouri Secretary of State (2010)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995).

green State Ex Rel. Missouri Parks Ass'n v. Missouri Department of National Resources (2010)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

In Farm Bureau Town, & County Insurance Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995), the Supreme Court concluded that a declaratory judgment action to determine the constitutionality of a statute regulating the insurance industry was premature as the constitutionality claim was necessarily mixed with other claims involving construction and violation of the statute.

green Przybylski v. Barbosa (2009)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

S & P Props., Inc. v. City of University City, 178 S.W.3d 579, 581 (Mo.App.2005). "[AIll facts alleged in *644 the petition are treated as true, and the petition is 'construed favorably to the plaintiff to determine whether the aver-ments invoke substantive principles of law which entitle the plaintiff to relief" Crocker, 261 S.W.3d at 726 (quoting Farm Bureau Town & Country Inc. Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995)).

green Raster v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc. (2009)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Crocker v. Crocker (2008)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Motor Control Specialties, Inc. v. Petelik (2008)

Quote Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Farm Bureau Town and Country Insurance Company of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 355 (Mo. banc 1995) (“constitutional issues should not be resolved unless essential to the court’s decision”).

“constitutional issues should not be resolved unless essential to the court’s decision”

green Committee for a Healthy Future, Inc. v. Carnahan (2006)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 350 (Mo. banc 1995). 3 .

green Kunzie v. City of Olivette (2006)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Low v. State, Department of Corrections (2005)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

S.D.2001) (quoting Farm Bureau Town & Country Ins. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995)).

green Crumbaker v. Zadow (2004)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Farm Bureau Town and Country Insurance Company of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Bender v. Forest Park Forever, Inc. (2004)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Farm Bureau Town and Country Insurance Company of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Newman v. City of Warsaw (2004)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995)).

green Anderson v. Village of Jacksonville (2003)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Mo. banc 1995).

green Malecon Tobacco, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Department of Taxation (2002)

Rule Authority · Nev.

Malpractice, 569 N.E.2d 191, 805-06 (Mass. 1991) (exhaustion of administrative remedies is not required for a facial challenge to the constitutionality of an agency’s enabling statute or for a *841 challenge to the statute as applied to the party where the issue does not depend upon factual determinations within the agency’s expertise); Jott, Inc. v. Clinton Tp., 569 N.W.2d 841, 846 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997) (“exhaustion of [administrative] remedies requirement does not apply to…

refusing to apply the exception to the exhaustion doctrine because the appellant’s claims involved construction of statutes and factual issues essential to determining whether the appellant violated the statutes which it claimed to be unconstitutional

green Kinder v. Holden (2002)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff 909 S.W.2d 348, 353 (Mo. banc 1995). “[I]n order to maintain a declaratory judgment action a petitioner must satisfy four requirements.” Northgate Apartments, L.P. v. City of North Kansas City, 45 S.W.3d 475, 479 (Mo.App.2001).

green Merrell v. Director of Revenue (2002)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

This result is in accord with the general rule that “[t]he proper remedy to contest the dismissal of a petition for writ of prohibition is a request for a writ from a higher court.” Farm Bureau Town and Country Insurance Company of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 355 (Mo. banc 1995).

green C.S. v. L.K.M. (2002)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo.banc 1995). .

green McDonald v. City of Brentwood (2001)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Missouri v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo. banc 1995); State ex rel.

green Hiler v. Director of Revenue (2001)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995). .

green Wright v. Department of Corrections (2001)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. of Mo. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995). “ ‘If the facts demonstrate any justiciable controversy, the trial court should declare the rights of the parties.’ ” Roy, 23 S.W.3d at 742 -43 (quoting Jones v. Carnahan, 965 S.W.2d 209, 214 (Mo.App.

green McDonald v. Thompson (2001)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

“The exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine is rooted in sound policy, as well as in both the state constitution and statutes.” 5 Farm Bureau Town & Country Ins. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo.banc 1995).

green Begshaw v. City of Independence (2000)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Clean Water Comm’n, 34 S.W.3d 197 (Mo.App.W.D.2000) (quoting Farm Bureau Town & Country Ins. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo. banc 1995)).

green State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co. (2000)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Co. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 352 (Mo. banc 1995). 11 .

green Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Clean Water Commission (2000)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Farm Bureau Town & Country Ins. v. Angoff, 909 S.W.2d 348, 354 (Mo.banc 1995).